Course record EBIO
EBIO 1230
General Biology Laboratory 1
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable98 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score38/100
Below averageHeather V Kenny 17 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.17
Connection3.70
Contribution3.37
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity4.23
Grading4.23
Reflection3.80
Respect4.63
Creativity3.87
Feedback4.23
Interaction3.73
Challenge4.13
Questions4.37
Alice Jeanne Del Simone 150 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
150 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.41
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity3.63
Grading4.59
Reflection4.72
Respect4.77
Creativity4.41
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.71
Questions4.85
Sallie Jane Tucker 17 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.87
Technology4.13
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration3.97
Connection3.83
Contribution3.73
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.37
Grading4.20
Reflection3.90
Respect4.57
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.13
Challenge4.07
Questions4.23
Jackson Brill 32 reported responses 3.68Eval / 5
Overall3.68 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.73
Synthesis3.63
Collaboration3.27
Connection3.27
Contribution3.40
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity2.77
Grading3.30
Reflection3.87
Respect4.23
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.53
Interaction3.80
Challenge3.93
Questions4.33
Jessica Edith Rush 19 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.23
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.70
Connection3.57
Contribution3.67
Discussion3.93
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.17
Reflection3.90
Respect4.37
Creativity3.93
Feedback4.13
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.10
Questions4.47
Alexander Todd Halverson 12 reported responses 3.52Eval / 5
Overall3.52 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.63
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.03
Collaboration2.27
Connection3.10
Contribution3.10
Discussion4.07
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.60
Reflection3.17
Respect4.53
Creativity2.93
Feedback3.07
Interaction3.87
Challenge3.80
Questions4.20
Katherine Joyce Kariatsumari 12 reported responses 3.45Eval / 5
Overall3.45 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.23
Collaboration2.87
Connection3.53
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.27
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.00
Reflection4.00
Respect3.87
Creativity3.33
Feedback3.77
Interaction3.27
Challenge3.50
Questions4.03
Lucy Hall 31 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration3.77
Connection4.23
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.63
Reflection4.53
Respect4.87
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.67
Questions4.70
Alyson Steel Ennis 16 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.23
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration3.57
Connection4.13
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.57
Grading4.13
Reflection4.17
Respect4.37
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.03
Challenge4.63
Questions4.50
Farron Mackenzie Straitz 18 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration3.57
Connection3.73
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity2.97
Grading4.30
Reflection4.20
Respect4.70
Creativity3.97
Feedback4.47
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.47
Questions4.47
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.