Course record EBIO
EBIO 1230
General Biology Laboratory 1
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable98 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score38/100
Below average
Heather V Kenny 17 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.17
Connection3.70
Contribution3.37
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity4.23
Grading4.23
Reflection3.80
Respect4.63
Creativity3.87
Feedback4.23
Interaction3.73
Challenge4.13
Questions4.37
Alice Jeanne Del Simone 150 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
150 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.41
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity3.63
Grading4.59
Reflection4.72
Respect4.77
Creativity4.41
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.71
Questions4.85
Sallie Jane Tucker 17 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.87
Technology4.13
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration3.97
Connection3.83
Contribution3.73
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.37
Grading4.20
Reflection3.90
Respect4.57
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.13
Challenge4.07
Questions4.23
Jackson Brill 32 reported responses 3.68Eval / 5
Overall3.68 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.73
Synthesis3.63
Collaboration3.27
Connection3.27
Contribution3.40
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity2.77
Grading3.30
Reflection3.87
Respect4.23
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.53
Interaction3.80
Challenge3.93
Questions4.33
Jessica Edith Rush 19 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.23
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.70
Connection3.57
Contribution3.67
Discussion3.93
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.17
Reflection3.90
Respect4.37
Creativity3.93
Feedback4.13
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.10
Questions4.47
Alexander Todd Halverson 12 reported responses 3.52Eval / 5
Overall3.52 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.63
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.03
Collaboration2.27
Connection3.10
Contribution3.10
Discussion4.07
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.60
Reflection3.17
Respect4.53
Creativity2.93
Feedback3.07
Interaction3.87
Challenge3.80
Questions4.20
Katherine Joyce Kariatsumari 12 reported responses 3.45Eval / 5
Overall3.45 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.23
Collaboration2.87
Connection3.53
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.27
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.00
Reflection4.00
Respect3.87
Creativity3.33
Feedback3.77
Interaction3.27
Challenge3.50
Questions4.03
Lucy Hall 31 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration3.77
Connection4.23
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.63
Reflection4.53
Respect4.87
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.67
Questions4.70
Alyson Steel Ennis 16 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.23
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration3.57
Connection4.13
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.57
Grading4.13
Reflection4.17
Respect4.37
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.03
Challenge4.63
Questions4.50
Farron Mackenzie Straitz 18 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration3.57
Connection3.73
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity2.97
Grading4.30
Reflection4.20
Respect4.70
Creativity3.97
Feedback4.47
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.47
Questions4.47
Tanisha Kaur 19 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.23
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.83
Connection3.73
Contribution3.47
Discussion3.93
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.07
Reflection3.63
Respect4.37
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.27
Interaction3.93
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Blessing Ife Sokoya 15 reported responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration3.13
Connection3.87
Contribution3.83
Discussion4.07
Inclusivity4.10
Grading3.53
Reflection3.87
Respect4.27
Creativity4.27
Feedback3.67
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.13
Questions4.00
Jordan Elise Tate 43 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.36
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.48
Connection3.95
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity3.49
Grading4.23
Reflection4.24
Respect4.54
Creativity4.23
Feedback3.98
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.51
Questions4.48
Sarah Margaret Anderson 14 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration3.53
Connection4.27
Contribution3.67
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.23
Reflection4.53
Respect4.83
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.17
Interaction4.27
Challenge4.47
Questions4.57
Skylar Montana Lynch 40 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.87
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.61
Contribution4.87
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.80
Reflection4.67
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.74
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.64
Questions5.00
Joseph Butterfield 93 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
93 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.65
Connection3.81
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity3.16
Grading3.95
Reflection4.37
Respect4.61
Creativity4.17
Feedback3.89
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.44
Questions4.58
Patrick Morrison 16 reported responses 3.67Eval / 5
Overall3.67 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.97
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.63
Collaboration3.37
Connection3.60
Contribution3.50
Discussion3.43
Inclusivity3.20
Grading3.20
Reflection3.47
Respect4.47
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.07
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.07
Questions3.83
Nicole Ks Brooks 47 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.25
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity3.83
Grading4.38
Reflection4.38
Respect4.65
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.73
Questions4.66
Stephanie K Jarvis 16 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.17
Connection4.47
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.33
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.33
Challenge4.43
Questions4.90
Irfan Alam 72 reported responses 3.68Eval / 5
Overall3.68 / 5
72 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology3.68
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration4.56
Connection3.75
Contribution4.24
Discussion3.51
Inclusivity3.35
Grading3.23
Reflection4.23
Respect4.00
Creativity3.51
Feedback2.86
Interaction4.79
Challenge3.60
Questions3.71
Luciana Escribens Carrillo 18 reported responses 3.72Eval / 5
Overall3.72 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.83
Technology4.03
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration2.63
Connection3.83
Contribution3.67
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity2.77
Grading3.57
Reflection3.53
Respect4.47
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.33
Interaction3.57
Challenge4.03
Questions3.93
John M Basey 135 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
135 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.19
Collaboration4.78
Connection3.89
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.44
Inclusivity3.49
Grading4.02
Reflection4.40
Respect4.64
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.60
Questions4.34
Katherine Hernandez 39 reported responses 3.75Eval / 5
Overall3.75 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.77
Technology3.05
Synthesis3.42
Collaboration4.32
Connection3.06
Contribution3.36
Discussion3.39
Inclusivity2.64
Grading2.95
Reflection3.85
Respect3.61
Creativity2.82
Feedback2.80
Interaction4.21
Challenge2.91
Questions3.03
Terez Chapman 14 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.83
Connection3.73
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.13
Grading4.33
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.40
Questions4.37
Xun Yu 38 reported responses 3.80Eval / 5
Overall3.80 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.63
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.47
Contribution4.03
Discussion3.63
Inclusivity2.20
Grading3.33
Reflection3.77
Respect4.60
Creativity3.30
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.73
Challenge3.70
Questions4.07
Leonardo Roman Orozco 19 reported responses 3.79Eval / 5
Overall3.79 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.57
Technology4.07
Synthesis3.43
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.53
Contribution3.83
Discussion3.93
Inclusivity2.53
Grading3.67
Reflection3.83
Respect4.13
Creativity3.63
Feedback3.37
Interaction4.27
Challenge3.63
Questions3.67
Jared Michael Collins 88 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
88 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.22
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity3.51
Grading4.04
Reflection4.51
Respect4.59
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.01
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.48
Questions4.68
Diego Alfonso Escobar-Garcia 4 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology3.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.00
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.25
Grading3.25
Reflection4.25
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.25
Questions4.50
Andrew George Gaier 24 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.27
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.60
Reflection4.53
Respect4.90
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.07
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.77
Questions5.00
Asia Amira Kaiser 30 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.17
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.23
Reflection4.37
Respect4.83
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.73
Questions4.80
Katherine Schoeller Gruenewald 15 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.47
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.03
Grading3.67
Reflection4.33
Respect4.80
Creativity4.77
Feedback3.97
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.67
Questions4.37
Henry Li 33 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.27
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity3.53
Grading4.70
Reflection4.67
Respect4.77
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.67
Questions4.83
William Jeffrey Reed 13 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.40
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.03
Grading4.07
Reflection4.47
Respect4.60
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.63
Questions4.40
Timothy Michael Korpita 28 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.23
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.63
Reflection4.57
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.77
Questions4.93
Luciana Escribens 44 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.13
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.68
Connection3.95
Contribution4.22
Discussion4.02
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.60
Reflection4.18
Respect4.23
Creativity4.22
Feedback3.48
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.05
Questions3.95
Emily Rose Curcio 43 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.83
Connection3.93
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.37
Grading4.23
Reflection4.43
Respect4.77
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.63
Questions4.93
Sara Garcia 65 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
65 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.41
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.05
Contribution4.21
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity3.89
Grading4.01
Reflection4.30
Respect4.79
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.02
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.59
Questions4.51
Julia Dean 41 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.80
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity3.53
Grading4.63
Reflection4.33
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.93
Andy Tan 37 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.33
Reflection4.47
Respect4.87
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Catherine Ikudaisi 74 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5
74 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.57
Synthesis3.97
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.06
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity2.36
Grading4.47
Reflection4.47
Respect4.58
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.34
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.66
Questions4.87
Kyle Samuel Schutz 28 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.35
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.50
Reflection4.73
Respect4.65
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.78
Questions4.73
Mailor Amaral 41 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.37
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.57
Reflection4.63
Respect4.90
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.63
Questions4.90
Ruth Quispe Pilco 31 reported responses 3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology3.81
Synthesis3.84
Collaboration4.81
Connection3.74
Contribution3.71
Discussion3.45
Inclusivity3.01
Grading2.99
Reflection3.74
Respect4.27
Creativity3.87
Feedback3.18
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.77
Questions4.06
William Anderson 24 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.40
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity3.67
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect4.53
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.87
Questions4.70
Rohit Taware 48 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
48 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.13
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity3.93
Grading4.27
Reflection4.47
Respect4.63
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.43
Questions4.73
Tanmay Desai 42 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology4.13
Synthesis3.77
Collaboration4.87
Connection3.67
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.23
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.63
Reflection4.10
Respect4.73
Creativity3.83
Feedback3.97
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.17
Questions4.23
Samantha Rothberg 42 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.13
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity3.87
Grading4.33
Reflection4.53
Respect4.77
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.67
Questions4.73
Vatsal Verma 64 reported responses 3.85Eval / 5
Overall3.85 / 5
64 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.18
Synthesis3.89
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.50
Contribution4.16
Discussion3.88
Inclusivity2.93
Grading3.55
Reflection3.87
Respect4.42
Creativity3.94
Feedback3.47
Interaction4.64
Challenge3.94
Questions4.25
Maya Shaulsky 74 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
74 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.29
Synthesis4.11
Collaboration4.81
Connection4.20
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.10
Reflection4.54
Respect4.84
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.56
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.64
Questions4.69
Maizy Brasher 45 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.30
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.50
Reflection4.57
Respect4.90
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.57
Questions4.77
Sahitya Kollipara 41 reported responses 3.36Eval / 5
Overall3.36 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.43
Technology3.27
Synthesis3.10
Collaboration4.43
Connection2.67
Contribution3.67
Discussion3.73
Inclusivity2.63
Grading2.37
Reflection3.37
Respect4.30
Creativity2.97
Feedback2.80
Interaction4.53
Challenge3.27
Questions3.50
Daniel Klee 61 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
61 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.44
Collaboration4.81
Connection4.31
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.36
Grading4.69
Reflection4.64
Respect4.58
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.56
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.62
Questions4.56
Rithik Kumar Athiganur Senthil 33 reported responses 3.81Eval / 5
Overall3.81 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.77
Technology3.37
Synthesis3.53
Collaboration4.63
Connection3.47
Contribution3.73
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.30
Grading3.23
Reflection4.07
Respect4.23
Creativity3.93
Feedback3.23
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.97
Questions4.17
Camryn Miller 81 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
81 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration4.87
Connection3.89
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity3.31
Grading4.09
Reflection4.49
Respect4.70
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.59
Questions4.76
Lincoln Taylor 42 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.03
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity3.13
Grading3.80
Reflection4.30
Respect4.57
Creativity4.33
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.33
Questions4.40
Kathryn Naherny 40 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.30
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.73
Reflection4.53
Respect4.83
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.67
Questions4.70
Ashley Duran-Sandoval 46 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.27
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.87
Connection3.90
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.27
Grading4.13
Reflection4.47
Respect4.67
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.37
Questions4.50
Maddy Reichel 31 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.53
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.83
Reflection4.80
Respect4.97
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.93
Questions4.97
Emma Britt 82 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
82 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.06
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.32
Reflection4.32
Respect4.68
Creativity4.51
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.55
Questions4.79
Stuti Pandey 47 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology4.73
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.87
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity3.23
Grading4.43
Reflection4.23
Respect4.70
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.17
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.33
Questions4.83
Pankhuri Singh 44 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.10
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.13
Grading4.23
Reflection4.57
Respect4.70
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.50
Questions4.57
Graydon Prosser Hidalgo 35 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration4.83
Connection3.77
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity4.13
Grading3.90
Reflection4.20
Respect4.83
Creativity3.67
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.07
Questions4.07
Hemanth Rao Karade Nagendra 27 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.70
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.63
Reflection4.00
Respect4.30
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.23
Questions4.30
Charlie Oliver 52 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
52 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.07
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.27
Reflection4.37
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.63
Questions4.77
Amir Ghayour 58 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
58 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.01
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.02
Collaboration4.57
Connection3.64
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.68
Grading3.85
Reflection4.25
Respect4.46
Creativity3.99
Feedback4.04
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.46
Questions4.56
Rachel Billings 39 reported responses 3.01Eval / 5
Overall3.01 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology2.70
Synthesis2.83
Collaboration4.57
Connection2.57
Contribution3.70
Discussion2.93
Inclusivity2.97
Grading1.83
Reflection3.00
Respect4.13
Creativity2.80
Feedback2.00
Interaction4.63
Challenge2.70
Questions2.67
Christi Suresh Fernandes 47 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.87
Connection3.83
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.20
Grading3.70
Reflection4.13
Respect4.67
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.73
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.00
Questions4.20
Deeptanshu Sankhwar 46 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.58
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.84
Grading3.92
Reflection4.29
Respect4.82
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.44
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.29
Questions4.67
Braden Johnson 42 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.17
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity3.17
Grading4.57
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.63
Questions4.80
Katie Gannon 80 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
80 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.26
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity3.62
Grading4.57
Reflection4.50
Respect4.79
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.81
Questions4.83
Treson Thompson 85 reported responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5
85 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.12
Technology4.21
Synthesis3.97
Collaboration4.67
Connection3.55
Contribution4.01
Discussion4.23
Inclusivity3.23
Grading3.51
Reflection3.90
Respect4.19
Creativity3.88
Feedback3.37
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.16
Questions4.01
Charlotte Sue 42 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.10
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.57
Grading4.53
Reflection4.30
Respect4.77
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Saket Bhosle 35 reported responses 3.46Eval / 5
Overall3.46 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.57
Technology3.60
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.20
Contribution3.67
Discussion3.57
Inclusivity3.17
Grading2.73
Reflection3.43
Respect3.83
Creativity3.70
Feedback2.80
Interaction4.10
Challenge3.73
Questions3.43
Shipra Singh 37 reported responses 3.68Eval / 5
Overall3.68 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.73
Technology3.84
Synthesis3.55
Collaboration4.42
Connection3.45
Contribution3.56
Discussion3.69
Inclusivity2.66
Grading3.16
Reflection3.86
Respect3.86
Creativity4.04
Feedback3.63
Interaction4.16
Challenge3.79
Questions3.73
Seth Raynor 49 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.10
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity3.57
Grading4.13
Reflection4.23
Respect4.53
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.63
Questions4.43
Ren Or Brendon Davis 37 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.13
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity4.10
Grading3.97
Reflection4.53
Respect4.53
Creativity4.27
Feedback3.83
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.37
Questions4.57
Anshul Jain 36 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.03
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.53
Grading4.10
Reflection4.47
Respect4.73
Creativity4.23
Feedback3.93
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Natalie Aranda 34 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.27
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.13
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.03
Grading4.23
Reflection4.50
Respect4.63
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Naya Oreilly 15 reported responses 2.90Eval / 5
Overall2.90 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.33
Technology2.73
Synthesis3.20
Collaboration4.37
Connection2.43
Contribution3.67
Discussion2.83
Inclusivity3.03
Grading2.27
Reflection3.27
Respect3.07
Creativity3.00
Feedback2.20
Interaction3.73
Challenge2.67
Questions2.53
Michael Hoffert 42 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.51
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity3.93
Grading4.63
Reflection4.77
Respect4.76
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.69
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.79
Questions4.89
Carmen Black 69 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
69 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.24
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity3.86
Grading4.59
Reflection4.64
Respect4.65
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.56
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.66
Questions4.69
Lena Faber 47 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration4.83
Connection3.90
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity3.30
Grading3.63
Reflection4.33
Respect4.53
Creativity4.27
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.63
Questions4.50
Niharika Sathyanarayana 15 reported responses 3.42Eval / 5
Overall3.42 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.73
Technology3.33
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration4.40
Connection2.57
Contribution3.57
Discussion2.87
Inclusivity3.17
Grading2.87
Reflection3.50
Respect4.63
Creativity3.23
Feedback2.87
Interaction4.63
Challenge2.90
Questions3.20
Abby Ross 28 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.20
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity3.77
Grading4.60
Reflection4.57
Respect4.60
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.80
Questions4.83
Asher Marvy 29 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.77
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity2.83
Grading3.93
Reflection4.43
Respect4.67
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.53
Questions4.80
Jacob Fenner 39 reported responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology4.03
Synthesis3.87
Collaboration4.67
Connection3.63
Contribution4.20
Discussion3.83
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.37
Reflection3.97
Respect4.13
Creativity3.97
Feedback3.53
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.07
Questions4.13
Nadia Alhassani 39 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.30
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity3.77
Grading4.63
Reflection4.67
Respect4.80
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.73
Questions4.77
Griffin Wagner 40 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.97
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.47
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity2.83
Grading3.93
Reflection4.10
Respect4.37
Creativity4.13
Feedback3.87
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.10
Questions4.53
Sebrina Brooks 37 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.03
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.87
Grading4.30
Reflection4.53
Respect4.97
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.53
Questions4.77
Nathaniel Neal 43 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.23
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity3.63
Grading4.70
Reflection4.53
Respect4.73
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.57
Questions4.80
Joey Lodge 16 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.27
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.13
Contribution4.20
Discussion3.87
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.67
Reflection4.30
Respect4.03
Creativity4.17
Feedback3.97
Interaction4.77
Challenge3.87
Questions4.27
Paige Mccreadie 39 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.40
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.37
Grading4.73
Reflection4.70
Respect4.93
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.70
Questions4.93
Amy Hodges 30 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.53
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.23
Grading4.80
Reflection4.73
Respect4.90
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.73
Questions4.90
Will Cox 21 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.57
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.17
Grading4.50
Reflection4.63
Respect4.57
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.73
Questions4.87
Megan Greenwood 29 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.03
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.17
Reflection4.70
Respect4.53
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.53
Questions4.73
Chris Arehart 39 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.97
Collaboration4.73
Connection3.77
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.03
Grading4.00
Reflection4.37
Respect4.40
Creativity4.13
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.23
Questions4.47
Rezan Algahtani 3 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.25
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.25
Questions5.00
Skylar Graves 3 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.