Course record DNCE
DNCE 4047
Dance & Hip-Hop History
University of Colorado Boulder
267 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score34/100
Below average
Lawrence T Southall 76 grades · 1 term 3.60GPA
76 letter grades
Compare with the course
Southall vs. the course average
A
+12.3
B
−8.3
C
−1.9
D
−1.9
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 76 enrolled.
Overall4.08 / 5
58 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.22
Technology4.14
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration3.53
Connection4.65
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.88
Grading3.77
Reflection4.60
Respect4.66
Creativity3.97
Feedback3.96
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.30
Questions4.53
Caroline Elizabeth Butcher 30 grades · 1 term 3.52GPA
30 letter grades
Compare with the course
Butcher vs. the course average
A
+14.5
B
−10.7
C
−7.1
D
−1.9
F
+5.2
Difference in percentage points.
3.2% withdrew · 1 of 31 enrolled.
Overall3.53 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration2.10
Connection4.10
Contribution2.90
Discussion3.60
Inclusivity4.60
Grading3.00
Reflection3.60
Respect4.50
Creativity3.30
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.10
Challenge3.60
Questions3.60
Lorenzo R. Harris 126 grades · 1 term 3.37GPA
126 letter grades
Compare with the course
Harris vs. the course average
A
−3.2
B
+1.0
C
+2.4
D
+0.5
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
1.6% withdrew · 2 of 128 enrolled.
Overall4.21 / 5
64 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.76
Technology3.65
Synthesis3.88
Collaboration3.31
Connection4.32
Contribution3.65
Discussion3.77
Inclusivity4.65
Grading3.25
Reflection4.09
Respect4.56
Creativity3.73
Feedback3.36
Interaction4.10
Challenge3.88
Questions3.54
Alston Tyndall 35 grades · 1 term 3.14GPA
35 letter grades
Compare with the course
Tyndall vs. the course average
A
−27.4
B
+23.6
C
+1.5
D
+3.8
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
2.8% withdrew · 1 of 36 enrolled.
Overall4.22 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration2.60
Connection4.90
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.10
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.50
Interaction3.60
Challenge4.30
Questions4.90
Nicole Rose Shindler 9 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
James Hoang Truong Nguyen 20 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.67
Synthesis3.92
Collaboration3.36
Connection4.78
Contribution4.18
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.41
Reflection4.48
Respect4.77
Creativity3.76
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.00
Questions4.46
Tyreis Adriel Hunte 27 reported responses 3.85Eval / 5
Overall3.85 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.53
Technology3.64
Synthesis3.71
Collaboration3.15
Connection4.22
Contribution3.42
Discussion3.17
Inclusivity4.54
Grading3.17
Reflection3.93
Respect4.62
Creativity3.56
Feedback3.24
Interaction3.87
Challenge3.73
Questions3.32
Angel Anderson 8 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Tanniqua-Kay Buchanan 10 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.70
Questions4.60
Lisa Engelken 8 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.60
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.00
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.