Course record CYBR
CYBR 5830
Special Topics
University of Colorado Boulder
114 grades9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score74/100
Strong
Garrett J Schumacher 46 grades · 1 term 3.98GPA
46 letter grades
Compare with the course
Schumacher vs. the course average
A
+4.0
B
−2.2
C
−0.9
D
same
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
4.2% withdrew · 2 of 48 enrolled.
Overall4.56 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.85
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.77
Reflection4.58
Respect4.88
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.51
Questions4.91
Al Pisano 30 grades · 1 term 3.94GPA
30 letter grades
Compare with the course
Pisano vs. the course average
A
+2.8
B
−1.1
C
−0.9
D
same
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
3.2% withdrew · 1 of 31 enrolled.
Overall3.88 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.40
Grading2.30
Reflection4.70
Respect4.30
Creativity4.80
Feedback2.70
Interaction3.40
Challenge4.90
Questions4.30
Kyle D Murbach 28 grades · 1 term 3.65GPA
28 letter grades
Compare with the course
Murbach vs. the course average
A
−11.7
B
+6.3
C
+2.7
D
same
F
+2.7
Difference in percentage points.
6.7% withdrew · 2 of 30 enrolled.
Overall4.41 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.89
Collaboration2.40
Connection3.47
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity4.91
Grading3.98
Reflection3.87
Respect4.99
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.54
Questions4.55
Walter Nolen Scaife 10 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.97GPA
10 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 10 enrolled.
Christopher Loveless 6 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.15
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.75
Reflection4.75
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.75
Nolen Scaife 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Hunter Thomas Albright 6 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.75
Reflection4.65
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.75
Questions4.90
John B Bernthal 14 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.90
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.70
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions4.80
Janelle R.W. Hsia 10 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.34
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration3.71
Connection5.00
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity3.62
Grading4.91
Reflection4.28
Respect4.38
Creativity3.99
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.59
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.