Course record CVEN

CVEN 4899

Civil Engineering Senior Project Design

University of Colorado Boulder

312 grades14 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score64/100
Strong

Professors 10 of 14

Michael N Gooseff 49 grades · 1 term 3.80GPA
91.8% A
6.1% B
2.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

49 letter grades

Compare with the course
Gooseff vs. the course average
A +14.3
B −13.7
C +0.4
D −0.6
F −0.3

Difference in percentage points.

2.0% withdrew · 1 of 50 enrolled.

Mija H. Hubler 63 grades · 1 term 3.71GPA
77.8% A
20.6% B
0.0% C
1.6% D
0.0% F

63 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hubler vs. the course average
A +0.2
B +0.8
C −1.6
D +0.9
F −0.3

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 63 enrolled.

Osamah H Dehwah 57 grades · 1 term 3.70GPA
80.7% A
17.5% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
1.8% F

57 letter grades

Compare with the course
Dehwah vs. the course average
A +3.1
B −2.3
C −1.6
D −0.6
F +1.4

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 57 enrolled.

Abbie Boggiano Liel 61 grades · 1 term 3.64GPA
72.1% A
21.3% B
4.9% C
1.6% D
0.0% F

61 letter grades

Compare with the course
Liel vs. the course average
A −5.4
B +1.4
C +3.3
D +1.0
F −0.3

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 61 enrolled.

Rajagopalan Balaji 72 grades · 1 term 3.63GPA
68.1% A
30.6% B
1.4% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

72 letter grades

Compare with the course
Balaji vs. the course average
A −9.5
B +10.7
C −0.2
D −0.6
F −0.3

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 72 enrolled.

Joel Stephen Sholtes 10 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.90GPA
90.0% A
10.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

10 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 10 enrolled.

Matthew R. Morris 127 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

127 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.83
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.27
Reflection4.26
Respect4.54
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.61
Questions4.65
Rich Regueiro 68 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

68 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.80
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.34
Grading4.31
Reflection4.28
Respect4.71
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.63
Questions4.74
Rebecca Atkins 1 reported responses 3.20Eval / 5
Overall3.20 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology1.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion5.00
Grading2.00
Reflection1.00
Respect3.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction2.00
Challenge5.00
Questions1.00
Shideh Dashti 24 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.80
Reflection3.70
Respect4.50
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.80
Questions4.50
Show all 14 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.