Course record CVEN
CVEN 3698
Engineering Geology
University of Colorado Boulder
228 grades7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score43/100
Mixed record
Tad Pfeffer 105 grades · 1 term 3.78GPA
105 letter grades
Compare with the course
Pfeffer vs. the course average
A
+7.3
B
−4.8
C
−1.6
D
−0.9
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 105 enrolled.
Overall3.57 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration2.70
Connection4.10
Contribution3.30
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.20
Grading3.30
Reflection3.40
Respect4.30
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.40
Interaction3.10
Challenge3.80
Questions4.30
Todd Nelson Loar 41 grades · 1 term 3.75GPA
41 letter grades
Compare with the course
Loar vs. the course average
A
+11.7
B
−7.3
C
−3.5
D
−0.9
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 41 enrolled.
Overall4.20 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.20
Connection4.60
Contribution3.60
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.20
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.30
Questions4.10
Tanya Shawn Unger 47 grades · 1 term 3.59GPA
47 letter grades
Compare with the course
Unger vs. the course average
A
−1.3
B
−2.8
C
+2.9
D
+1.3
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
2.1% withdrew · 1 of 48 enrolled.
Overall3.95 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.40
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.40
Reflection3.70
Respect4.20
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.80
Questions4.30
Bernard Amadei 35 grades · 1 term 3.26GPA
35 letter grades
Compare with the course
Amadei vs. the course average
A
−33.7
B
+26.6
C
+5.1
D
+2.0
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
2.8% withdrew · 1 of 36 enrolled.
Overall3.67 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology3.48
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration3.68
Connection4.57
Contribution3.42
Discussion3.44
Inclusivity3.72
Grading2.85
Reflection3.95
Respect4.64
Creativity3.85
Feedback2.98
Interaction3.71
Challenge4.34
Questions3.68
Hannah Pritchard Whitworth 4 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.50
Contribution3.30
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction3.80
Challenge5.00
Questions4.30
William T Pfeffer 14 reported responses 3.87Eval / 5
Overall3.87 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology3.46
Synthesis3.46
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.38
Contribution3.08
Discussion3.46
Inclusivity2.85
Grading3.08
Reflection4.00
Respect4.69
Creativity3.85
Feedback3.23
Interaction3.77
Challenge3.92
Questions4.31
Sean Thomas Sundermann 36 reported responses 3.85Eval / 5
Overall3.85 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.34
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.06
Collaboration3.16
Connection4.78
Contribution3.86
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity3.82
Grading3.57
Reflection4.15
Respect4.63
Creativity4.04
Feedback3.52
Interaction4.33
Challenge3.95
Questions4.31
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.