Course record CVEN
CVEN 3525
Structural Analysis
University of Colorado Boulder
471 grades7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score11/100
Needs work
Sannidhya Kunar Ghosh 116 grades · 1 term 3.77GPA
116 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ghosh vs. the course average
A
+37.9
B
−8.0
C
−14.0
D
−6.8
F
−9.1
Difference in percentage points.
3.3% withdrew · 4 of 120 enrolled.
Overall4.09 / 5
79 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.60
Connection4.00
Contribution3.30
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.30
Reflection4.20
Respect4.70
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Jeong-Hoon Song 51 grades · 1 term 3.09GPA
51 letter grades
Compare with the course
Song vs. the course average
A
same
B
+4.4
C
+5.6
D
−0.9
F
−9.1
Difference in percentage points.
1.9% withdrew · 1 of 52 enrolled.
Overall4.24 / 5
91 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology3.64
Synthesis3.99
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.20
Contribution3.48
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.72
Grading4.26
Reflection4.17
Respect4.36
Creativity4.34
Feedback4.02
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.32
Questions4.39
George Hearn 186 grades · 1 term 2.93GPA
186 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hearn vs. the course average
A
−4.4
B
+4.2
C
+3.7
D
+0.2
F
−3.8
Difference in percentage points.
4.1% withdrew · 8 of 194 enrolled.
Overall3.19 / 5
82 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.47
Technology3.41
Synthesis3.17
Collaboration2.35
Connection4.16
Contribution3.37
Discussion4.08
Inclusivity2.57
Grading3.54
Reflection3.74
Respect3.32
Creativity2.95
Feedback2.73
Interaction3.29
Challenge3.58
Questions3.71
Golsa Mahdavi 73 grades · 1 term 1.61GPA
73 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mahdavi vs. the course average
A
−33.5
B
−3.7
C
+3.8
D
+8.3
F
+25.1
Difference in percentage points.
1.4% withdrew · 1 of 74 enrolled.
Overall2.31 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.40
Technology1.90
Synthesis2.40
Collaboration1.60
Connection2.20
Contribution2.10
Discussion2.50
Inclusivity1.60
Grading1.70
Reflection2.40
Respect3.00
Creativity2.70
Feedback1.70
Interaction2.60
Challenge3.00
Questions2.40
Ulises Daniel Techera Rocha 23 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.72GPA
23 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 23 enrolled.
Overall4.02 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.22
Synthesis3.91
Collaboration4.39
Connection4.51
Contribution4.22
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.03
Grading3.91
Reflection4.52
Respect4.85
Creativity4.21
Feedback4.34
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.60
Questions4.42
Victor Saouma 22 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 1.73GPA
22 letter grades · Limited sample
8.3% withdrew · 2 of 24 enrolled.
Overall2.21 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.60
Technology1.90
Synthesis2.20
Collaboration2.60
Connection2.80
Contribution2.50
Discussion2.40
Inclusivity1.80
Grading1.80
Reflection2.40
Respect1.90
Creativity2.10
Feedback1.60
Interaction2.20
Challenge2.80
Questions2.70
Sannidhya Kumar Ghosh 79 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5
79 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.60
Connection4.00
Contribution3.30
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.30
Reflection4.20
Respect4.70
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.