Course record CVEN
CVEN 3256
Construction Equipment and Methods
University of Colorado Boulder
325 grades8 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score24/100
Below average
Christopher T Senseney 149 grades · 1 term 3.58GPA
149 letter grades
Compare with the course
Senseney vs. the course average
A
+21.5
B
−10.7
C
−6.3
D
−3.3
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 2 of 151 enrolled.
Overall4.02 / 5
124 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.41
Technology3.61
Synthesis3.31
Collaboration2.80
Connection3.91
Contribution3.21
Discussion3.61
Inclusivity3.01
Grading2.92
Reflection3.21
Respect3.32
Creativity3.11
Feedback2.62
Interaction3.61
Challenge3.81
Questions3.81
Siddharth Bhandari 99 grades · 1 term 2.92GPA
99 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bhandari vs. the course average
A
−13.9
B
+1.8
C
+5.9
D
+3.5
F
+2.8
Difference in percentage points.
2.0% withdrew · 2 of 101 enrolled.
Overall4.50 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.19
Synthesis4.41
Collaboration4.21
Connection4.87
Contribution4.41
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity3.67
Grading4.17
Reflection4.51
Respect4.63
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.51
Questions4.39
Alfonso Gonzalo Bastias 51 grades · 1 term 2.79GPA
51 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bastias vs. the course average
A
−28.8
B
+15.6
C
+11.2
D
+3.2
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
1.9% withdrew · 1 of 52 enrolled.
Amir Behzadan 16 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.29GPA
16 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 16 enrolled.
Overall3.89 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.93
Technology4.23
Synthesis3.73
Collaboration3.97
Connection4.40
Contribution3.97
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.46
Grading3.78
Reflection4.13
Respect4.18
Creativity4.01
Feedback3.73
Interaction4.23
Challenge4.08
Questions4.29
Ulises Daniel Techera Rocha 10 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.14GPA
10 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 10 enrolled.
Overall3.99 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.13
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.26
Connection4.69
Contribution4.22
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity3.71
Grading4.13
Reflection4.42
Respect4.72
Creativity4.36
Feedback3.97
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.51
Questions4.11
Mohammad Zobair Ibne Bashar 22 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.30
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Arnaldo Bayona Malo 11 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.50
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.20
Grading3.60
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.20
Questions4.50
David James Hartmann 2 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.