Course record CVEN
CVEN 2121
Analytical Mechanics 1
University of Colorado Boulder
499 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score15/100
Needs work
Fatemeh Pourahmadian 85 grades · 1 term 3.43GPA
85 letter grades
Compare with the course
Pourahmadian vs. the course average
A
+13.6
B
+10.2
C
−15.7
D
−4.8
F
−3.2
Difference in percentage points.
1.2% withdrew · 1 of 86 enrolled.
Overall3.98 / 5
89 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.08
Technology3.98
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.73
Connection4.30
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity3.48
Grading3.87
Reflection4.05
Respect4.35
Creativity4.11
Feedback3.49
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.10
Questions3.97
Yunping Xi 107 grades · 1 term 3.34GPA
107 letter grades
Compare with the course
Xi vs. the course average
A
+18.6
B
+3.3
C
−17.6
D
−2.9
F
−1.3
Difference in percentage points.
3.6% withdrew · 4 of 111 enrolled.
Overall3.41 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.98
Technology1.88
Synthesis3.23
Collaboration1.94
Connection4.03
Contribution2.84
Discussion2.95
Inclusivity2.39
Grading2.78
Reflection3.51
Respect3.66
Creativity3.32
Feedback2.96
Interaction3.54
Challenge3.35
Questions3.71
Jeong-Hoon Song 236 grades · 1 term 2.71GPA
236 letter grades
Compare with the course
Song vs. the course average
A
−7.1
B
−4.2
C
+10.5
D
+2.4
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
1.7% withdrew · 4 of 240 enrolled.
Overall4.15 / 5
147 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.04
Synthesis4.24
Collaboration3.69
Connection4.53
Contribution3.68
Discussion4.29
Inclusivity3.99
Grading4.38
Reflection4.44
Respect4.44
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.21
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.46
Questions4.36
Maria Jose Echeverria 71 grades · 1 term 2.20GPA
71 letter grades
Compare with the course
Echeverria vs. the course average
A
−20.6
B
−3.1
C
+10.5
D
+2.2
F
+10.9
Difference in percentage points.
2.7% withdrew · 2 of 73 enrolled.
Overall3.53 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration2.60
Connection3.70
Contribution3.20
Discussion3.60
Inclusivity3.20
Grading3.50
Reflection3.90
Respect4.20
Creativity3.90
Feedback2.90
Interaction3.60
Challenge3.80
Questions4.00
Tad Pfeffer 9 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.10
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.90
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.40
William T Pfeffer 3 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Katherine Ramos 8 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.73
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.78
Grading4.73
Reflection4.62
Respect4.88
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.50
Questions4.34
Ronald Y S Pak 41 reported responses 3.75Eval / 5
Overall3.75 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.88
Technology3.22
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration2.97
Connection4.62
Contribution3.54
Discussion3.91
Inclusivity3.75
Grading3.79
Reflection3.92
Respect4.72
Creativity4.19
Feedback3.54
Interaction3.95
Challenge4.08
Questions4.01
Jay Hoberg Arehart 5 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Yifan Yang 5 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.40
Connection5.00
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.40
Creativity4.20
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.