Course record CSPB
CSPB 1300
Computer Science 1: Starting Computing
University of Colorado Boulder
310 grades7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score50/100
Mixed record
Chanheum Park 81 grades · 1 term 3.66GPA
81 letter grades
Compare with the course
Park vs. the course average
A
+7.7
B
−6.3
C
−0.2
D
−0.4
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
2.4% withdrew · 2 of 83 enrolled.
Overall4.34 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.12
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.01
Collaboration3.66
Connection4.07
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.36
Inclusivity2.69
Grading4.56
Reflection4.55
Respect4.87
Creativity4.11
Feedback3.69
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.35
Questions4.37
David Allen Knox 67 grades · 1 term 3.65GPA
67 letter grades
Compare with the course
Knox vs. the course average
A
+3.4
B
−1.0
C
−0.7
D
−1.6
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
4.3% withdrew · 3 of 70 enrolled.
Overall4.44 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.78
Connection3.92
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity3.61
Grading4.75
Reflection4.34
Respect4.85
Creativity4.38
Feedback3.79
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.27
Questions4.52
Hiroshi G Kobayashi 76 grades · 1 term 3.54GPA
76 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kobayashi vs. the course average
A
−2.4
B
+3.2
C
−1.2
D
−0.3
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
5.0% withdrew · 4 of 80 enrolled.
Overall4.53 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.79
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration3.37
Connection4.10
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.01
Grading4.80
Reflection4.41
Respect4.88
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.86
Questions4.81
Francis Russell Jones 69 grades · 1 term 3.39GPA
69 letter grades
Compare with the course
Jones vs. the course average
A
−7.7
B
+1.6
C
+2.1
D
+2.7
F
+1.3
Difference in percentage points.
5.5% withdrew · 4 of 73 enrolled.
Overall4.47 / 5
52 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration3.84
Connection3.91
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity3.38
Grading4.55
Reflection4.48
Respect4.78
Creativity4.62
Feedback3.93
Interaction4.64
Challenge4.60
Questions4.29
Cailyn L Craven 17 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.59GPA
17 letter grades · Limited sample
5.6% withdrew · 1 of 18 enrolled.
Overall4.60 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.20
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.65
Reflection4.65
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.65
Questions4.85
Divya Nallawar 4 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.80
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.20
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.20
Questions4.80
Supriya Manikonda Keshavaiah Naidu 42 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.84
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.65
Connection3.40
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity2.75
Grading4.41
Reflection4.28
Respect4.88
Creativity4.25
Feedback3.58
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.45
Questions4.40
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.