Course record CSCI
CSCI 6402
Issues and Methods in Cognitive Science
University of Colorado Boulder
69 grades7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score69/100
StrongMarta Ceko 35 grades · 1 term 3.94GPA
35 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ceko vs. the course average
A
+3.0
B
−1.5
C
−1.4
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 35 enrolled.
Overall4.30 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Jason Ian Zietz 34 grades · 1 term 3.82GPA
34 letter grades
Compare with the course
Zietz vs. the course average
A
−3.1
B
+1.6
C
+1.5
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
2.9% withdrew · 1 of 35 enrolled.
Overall3.97 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.60
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading2.90
Reflection4.60
Respect4.50
Creativity3.80
Feedback2.40
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Ronald Mckell Carston 6 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.70
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.20
Reflection4.00
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.20
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.20
Questions4.70
James H Martin 17 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.97
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.52
Connection4.89
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.89
Grading3.04
Reflection4.85
Respect4.94
Creativity4.05
Feedback3.04
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.93
Questions4.79
Roland Benoit 12 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.83
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.81
Contribution4.98
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.91
Grading4.02
Reflection4.73
Respect5.00
Creativity4.78
Feedback3.97
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.93
Questions4.87
Theodora Chaspari 13 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.96
Technology4.95
Synthesis2.70
Collaboration4.21
Connection4.95
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.98
Grading4.81
Reflection4.18
Respect5.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.99
Questions4.97
Rosemary Cowell 1 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis2.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.