Course record CSCI

CSCI 4318

Software Engineering Project 2

University of Colorado Boulder

688 grades17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score75/100
Strong

Professors 10 of 17

Alan Paradise 688 grades · 1 term 3.88GPA
92.3% A
5.5% B
1.3% C
0.3% D
0.6% F

688 letter grades

0.1% withdrew · 1 of 689 enrolled.

Chelsea Kendall Chandler 41 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

41 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.70
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Bryce Ikeda 41 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5

41 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.90
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.80
Joewie Joo-Wee Koh 41 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

41 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.80
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Rohan Das 108 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

108 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.59
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.36
Grading4.94
Reflection4.49
Respect4.97
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.87
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.83
Questions4.87
Kirby James Linvill 31 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
James Watson 31 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.70
Dreycey Albin 29 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.50
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.10
David Baines 79 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

79 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.58
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.36
Grading4.73
Reflection4.48
Respect4.88
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.71
Questions4.80
Julie Jarzemsky 28 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.70
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Show all 17 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.