Course record CSCI

CSCI 4308

Software Engineering Project 1

University of Colorado Boulder

746 grades17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score70/100
Strong

Professors 10 of 17

Alan Paradise 746 grades · 1 term 3.94GPA
96.0% A
2.8% B
0.3% C
0.8% D
0.1% F

746 letter grades

0.5% withdrew · 4 of 750 enrolled.

Rohan Das 96 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

96 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.55
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.22
Grading4.72
Reflection4.34
Respect4.76
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.67
Questions4.71
Kirby James Linvill 52 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

52 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.80
Reflection4.30
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.90
James Watson 51 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

51 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.30
Reflection4.30
Respect4.60
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Katherine Elizabeth Nielsen 10 reported responses 3.87Eval / 5
Overall3.87 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology3.66
Synthesis3.74
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.03
Contribution4.14
Discussion3.72
Inclusivity2.71
Grading2.85
Reflection3.74
Respect3.94
Creativity3.57
Feedback3.14
Interaction4.49
Challenge4.20
Questions3.74
Dreycey Albin 30 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.60
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.50
David Baines 90 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

90 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.22
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.52
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.29
Reflection4.28
Respect4.56
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.11
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.22
Questions4.50
Owen Martin 29 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.50
Rahul Aedula 16 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.60
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.60
Reflection4.20
Respect4.60
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.50
Michael Jeffery Daniel Hoefer 12 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.70
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Show all 17 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.