Course record CSCI
CSCI 4308
Software Engineering Project 1
University of Colorado Boulder
746 grades17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score70/100
StrongAlan Paradise 746 grades · 1 term 3.94GPA
746 letter grades
0.5% withdrew · 4 of 750 enrolled.
Overall4.09 / 5
177 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.94
Technology4.07
Synthesis4.12
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.42
Contribution3.95
Discussion3.94
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.04
Reflection4.10
Respect4.38
Creativity4.04
Feedback3.28
Interaction4.53
Challenge3.97
Questions4.14
Rohan Das 96 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
96 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.55
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.22
Grading4.72
Reflection4.34
Respect4.76
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.67
Questions4.71
Kirby James Linvill 52 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
52 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.80
Reflection4.30
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.90
James Watson 51 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
51 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.30
Reflection4.30
Respect4.60
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Katherine Elizabeth Nielsen 10 reported responses 3.87Eval / 5
Overall3.87 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology3.66
Synthesis3.74
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.03
Contribution4.14
Discussion3.72
Inclusivity2.71
Grading2.85
Reflection3.74
Respect3.94
Creativity3.57
Feedback3.14
Interaction4.49
Challenge4.20
Questions3.74
Dreycey Albin 30 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.60
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.50
David Baines 90 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
90 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.22
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.52
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.29
Reflection4.28
Respect4.56
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.11
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.22
Questions4.50
Owen Martin 29 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.50
Rahul Aedula 16 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.60
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.60
Reflection4.20
Respect4.60
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.50
Michael Jeffery Daniel Hoefer 12 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.70
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.