Course record CSCI
CSCI 3832
Natural Language Processing
University of Colorado Boulder
264 grades8 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score9/100
Needs workAdam Josef Wiemerslage 65 grades · 1 term 3.34GPA
65 letter grades
Compare with the course
Wiemerslage vs. the course average
A
+19.8
B
−1.4
C
−7.0
D
−8.0
F
−3.4
Difference in percentage points.
9.7% withdrew · 7 of 72 enrolled.
Overall3.51 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology3.60
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.40
Connection3.60
Contribution3.80
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity3.90
Grading2.80
Reflection3.40
Respect4.20
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.10
Challenge3.60
Questions3.60
Abhidip Bhattacharyya 29 grades · 1 term 3.22GPA
29 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bhattacharyya vs. the course average
A
+24.5
B
−11.1
C
−7.5
D
−4.5
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
14.7% withdrew · 5 of 34 enrolled.
Overall4.51 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.20
Connection4.30
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Katharina Lisa Maria Kann 103 grades · 1 term 2.64GPA
103 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kann vs. the course average
A
−14.7
B
+11.4
C
+4.5
D
−2.1
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
8.0% withdrew · 9 of 112 enrolled.
Overall3.35 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.67
Technology3.81
Synthesis3.78
Collaboration3.78
Connection3.80
Contribution3.39
Discussion3.65
Inclusivity3.56
Grading3.01
Reflection3.68
Respect4.07
Creativity3.58
Feedback2.55
Interaction3.84
Challenge3.71
Questions3.38
Felix Alder Ellen Muzny 67 grades · 1 term 2.40GPA
67 letter grades
Compare with the course
Muzny vs. the course average
A
−7.2
B
−11.3
C
+3.1
D
+12.9
F
+2.5
Difference in percentage points.
16.3% withdrew · 13 of 80 enrolled.
Ananya Ganesh 31 reported responses 3.43Eval / 5
Overall3.43 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology3.60
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.40
Connection3.60
Contribution3.80
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.90
Grading2.70
Reflection3.40
Respect4.10
Creativity3.40
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.10
Challenge3.40
Questions3.50
Abteen A Ebrahimi 38 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.20
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.20
Reflection3.80
Respect4.70
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.20
Questions4.40
Enora Rice 38 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.20
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.30
Reflection3.80
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.10
Questions4.30
Maria Pacheco Gonzalez 5 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration2.40
Connection4.60
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.60
Reflection4.20
Respect4.40
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction3.40
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.