Course record CSCI

CSCI 3308

Software Development Methods and Tools

University of Colorado Boulder

2,240 grades43 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score38/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 43

Sreesha Saseendra Nath 1,689 grades · 1 term 3.54GPA
72.2% A
18.1% B
5.9% C
1.4% D
2.4% F

1,689 letter grades

Compare with the course
Nath vs. the course average
A +2.2
B −1.3
C −0.2
D −0.2
F −0.4

Difference in percentage points.

3.5% withdrew · 62 of 1,751 enrolled.

Asa M Ashraf 551 grades · 1 term 3.36GPA
63.2% A
23.4% B
6.9% C
2.4% D
4.2% F

551 letter grades

Compare with the course
Ashraf vs. the course average
A −6.8
B +4.0
C +0.7
D +0.7
F +1.4

Difference in percentage points.

3.7% withdrew · 21 of 572 enrolled.

Carl Mueller 25 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.70
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.45
Reflection4.35
Respect4.75
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.55
Questions4.75
Surya Prakash Kanoria 25 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.25
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.50
Questions4.75
Vishwanath D Kulkarni 39 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5

39 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.81
Technology4.37
Synthesis3.92
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.19
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.18
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.41
Reflection4.03
Respect4.61
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.44
Interaction4.72
Challenge3.96
Questions4.14
Venkat Brahma Akilesh Arigela 22 reported responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.05
Technology3.83
Synthesis3.48
Collaboration4.06
Connection3.41
Contribution3.46
Discussion3.58
Inclusivity2.79
Grading4.08
Reflection3.56
Respect4.01
Creativity3.49
Feedback3.41
Interaction3.84
Challenge3.39
Questions3.81
Annika Muehlbradt 12 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.65
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.50
Reflection4.65
Respect4.85
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Karthik Siddaramanna 37 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.22
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.23
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity3.73
Grading3.97
Reflection4.02
Respect4.90
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.60
Questions4.41
Cory Kalani Paik 58 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

58 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.46
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity4.34
Grading4.52
Reflection4.49
Respect4.91
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.60
Questions4.45
Shruthi Sridharan 10 reported responses 2.70Eval / 5
Overall2.70 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence1.95
Technology2.40
Synthesis2.15
Collaboration3.70
Connection2.20
Contribution2.20
Discussion3.60
Inclusivity4.00
Grading2.40
Reflection2.45
Respect4.60
Creativity1.95
Feedback2.90
Interaction2.40
Challenge2.00
Questions3.40
Show all 43 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.