Course record CSCI
CSCI 3308
Software Development Methods and Tools
University of Colorado Boulder
2,240 grades43 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score38/100
Below average
Sreesha Saseendra Nath 1,689 grades · 1 term 3.54GPA
1,689 letter grades
Compare with the course
Nath vs. the course average
A
+2.2
B
−1.3
C
−0.2
D
−0.2
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
3.5% withdrew · 62 of 1,751 enrolled.
Overall3.68 / 5
464 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.77
Technology3.29
Synthesis2.93
Collaboration3.86
Connection3.71
Contribution2.89
Discussion2.88
Inclusivity2.67
Grading2.65
Reflection3.28
Respect3.28
Creativity2.88
Feedback2.07
Interaction3.58
Challenge2.88
Questions3.12
Asa M Ashraf 551 grades · 1 term 3.36GPA
551 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ashraf vs. the course average
A
−6.8
B
+4.0
C
+0.7
D
+0.7
F
+1.4
Difference in percentage points.
3.7% withdrew · 21 of 572 enrolled.
Overall3.54 / 5
172 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.21
Technology3.61
Synthesis3.36
Collaboration3.97
Connection3.92
Contribution3.29
Discussion3.23
Inclusivity2.94
Grading3.32
Reflection3.45
Respect3.82
Creativity3.71
Feedback2.60
Interaction3.84
Challenge3.84
Questions3.32
Carl Mueller 25 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.70
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.45
Reflection4.35
Respect4.75
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.55
Questions4.75
Surya Prakash Kanoria 25 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.25
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.50
Questions4.75
Vishwanath D Kulkarni 39 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.81
Technology4.37
Synthesis3.92
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.19
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.18
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.41
Reflection4.03
Respect4.61
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.44
Interaction4.72
Challenge3.96
Questions4.14
Venkat Brahma Akilesh Arigela 22 reported responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.05
Technology3.83
Synthesis3.48
Collaboration4.06
Connection3.41
Contribution3.46
Discussion3.58
Inclusivity2.79
Grading4.08
Reflection3.56
Respect4.01
Creativity3.49
Feedback3.41
Interaction3.84
Challenge3.39
Questions3.81
Annika Muehlbradt 12 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.65
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.50
Reflection4.65
Respect4.85
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Karthik Siddaramanna 37 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.22
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.23
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity3.73
Grading3.97
Reflection4.02
Respect4.90
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.60
Questions4.41
Cory Kalani Paik 58 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
58 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.46
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity4.34
Grading4.52
Reflection4.49
Respect4.91
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.60
Questions4.45
Shruthi Sridharan 10 reported responses 2.70Eval / 5
Overall2.70 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence1.95
Technology2.40
Synthesis2.15
Collaboration3.70
Connection2.20
Contribution2.20
Discussion3.60
Inclusivity4.00
Grading2.40
Reflection2.45
Respect4.60
Creativity1.95
Feedback2.90
Interaction2.40
Challenge2.00
Questions3.40
Dwight Julian Browne 5 reported responses 2.92Eval / 5
Overall2.92 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.12
Technology3.07
Synthesis3.16
Collaboration2.78
Connection3.00
Contribution2.62
Discussion3.45
Inclusivity1.62
Grading2.54
Reflection3.07
Respect3.16
Creativity2.93
Feedback2.23
Interaction3.16
Challenge3.16
Questions3.70
Adam Josef Wiemerslage 17 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.10
Technology4.45
Synthesis3.45
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.65
Contribution3.50
Discussion3.75
Inclusivity3.05
Grading3.95
Reflection3.75
Respect4.60
Creativity3.75
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.35
Challenge3.85
Questions3.80
Wyatt Jackson Rees 31 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.55
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.17
Grading4.75
Reflection4.42
Respect4.95
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.63
Questions4.86
Tzu-Chi Yen 16 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.55
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.65
Reflection4.70
Respect4.95
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Aishwarya Purandas Satwani 51 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
51 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology4.21
Synthesis3.83
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.35
Contribution4.06
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.34
Grading3.94
Reflection4.02
Respect4.29
Creativity3.65
Feedback3.69
Interaction4.32
Challenge3.98
Questions4.42
Sreeram Ganesan 12 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.60
Kanaka Samagna Talanki Sreenivasa Murthy 7 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.50
Contribution4.40
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.90
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.30
Questions4.60
Rohan Das 5 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology4.90
Synthesis2.84
Collaboration4.28
Connection4.28
Contribution4.28
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.39
Reflection5.00
Respect4.17
Creativity4.17
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.06
Challenge4.28
Questions4.25
Swaminathan Sriram 26 reported responses 3.64Eval / 5
Overall3.64 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.61
Technology3.00
Synthesis3.11
Collaboration3.63
Connection3.05
Contribution3.24
Discussion3.32
Inclusivity2.60
Grading3.13
Reflection2.90
Respect3.65
Creativity3.18
Feedback2.92
Interaction3.50
Challenge3.09
Questions3.17
Nikita Kakkayur Palliyil 28 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.83
Technology4.79
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.17
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity3.58
Grading4.50
Reflection4.12
Respect4.75
Creativity4.04
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.39
Questions4.84
William Warren Wright 3 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.00
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.30
Questions5.00
Bhoomika Singla 16 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.41
Contribution4.28
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity3.62
Grading3.96
Reflection4.52
Respect4.62
Creativity4.21
Feedback3.86
Interaction4.49
Challenge4.51
Questions4.35
Shipra Singh 8 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.79
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.93
Reflection4.70
Respect4.86
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.68
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.75
Questions4.84
Kelechi Ezema 10 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.97
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.97
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.97
Contribution4.97
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.97
Grading4.96
Reflection4.98
Respect4.99
Creativity4.97
Feedback4.97
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.97
Questions4.98
Varsha Natarajan 9 reported responses 3.39Eval / 5
Overall3.39 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.19
Technology4.15
Synthesis3.35
Collaboration4.23
Connection3.65
Contribution3.46
Discussion3.77
Inclusivity3.42
Grading4.00
Reflection3.85
Respect3.92
Creativity3.54
Feedback3.27
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.81
Questions4.15
Mohit Snehal 9 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.40
Questions4.70
Nikhil Hulle 5 reported responses 3.63Eval / 5
Overall3.63 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.20
Collaboration4.40
Connection2.80
Contribution3.40
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity1.80
Grading3.80
Reflection3.80
Respect4.40
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.20
Questions3.80
Bhargav Shandilya 24 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.54
Contribution4.42
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.56
Reflection4.52
Respect4.92
Creativity4.81
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Lorin Achey 8 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.60
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Abijith Trichur Ramachandran 18 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.99
Technology4.26
Synthesis4.02
Collaboration4.27
Connection3.69
Contribution3.87
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity3.16
Grading3.83
Reflection3.96
Respect4.14
Creativity4.42
Feedback3.64
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.05
Questions4.17
Zhuoheng Li 17 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.86
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.21
Grading4.09
Reflection4.86
Respect4.75
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.79
Questions4.91
Chloe Eggleston 11 reported responses 3.56Eval / 5
Overall3.56 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.10
Contribution4.20
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity3.40
Grading3.00
Reflection3.50
Respect4.00
Creativity3.40
Feedback2.80
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.40
Questions3.80
Mary Martin 10 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.40
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Disha Gundecha 6 reported responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.80
Reflection4.30
Respect4.00
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.80
Questions4.20
Ian Christie 5 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.80
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Vinay Nagalapura Ramesh 2 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Christopher Ojukwu 5 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.80
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.80
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.20
Questions4.40
Maria Valentini 4 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.80
Reflection4.20
Respect5.00
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.80
Questions4.50
Ava Abderezaei 14 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.66
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.31
Grading4.56
Reflection4.72
Respect4.91
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.64
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.77
Questions4.75
Mateo Cantagallo 8 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.40
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.10
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Jen Macdonald 13 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.82
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.91
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.34
Grading4.84
Reflection4.75
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.58
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.82
Questions4.88
Zhihao Lyu 8 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.32
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity3.93
Grading4.15
Reflection4.32
Respect4.93
Creativity4.31
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.08
Questions4.45
Zachary Kaufman 7 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.90
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.10
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity3.00
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.