Course record CSCI

CSCI 3202

Introduction to Artificial Intelligence

University of Colorado Boulder

1,465 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score34/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 11

Zachary Kidder Mullen 162 grades · 1 term 3.50GPA
68.5% A
21.0% B
7.4% C
1.2% D
1.9% F

162 letter grades

Compare with the course
Mullen vs. the course average
A +5.6
B −3.7
C −0.6
D +0.1
F −1.4

Difference in percentage points.

1.8% withdrew · 3 of 165 enrolled.

James E Dykes 283 grades · 1 term 3.49GPA
65.7% A
25.8% B
4.9% C
1.1% D
2.5% F

283 letter grades

Compare with the course
Dykes vs. the course average
A +2.8
B +1.2
C −3.0
D −0.1
F −0.8

Difference in percentage points.

1.0% withdrew · 3 of 286 enrolled.

Rachel Suzanne-Tutmaher Cox 527 grades · 1 term 3.45GPA
65.8% A
21.8% B
8.3% C
1.3% D
2.7% F

527 letter grades

Compare with the course
Cox vs. the course average
A +2.9
B −2.8
C +0.4
D +0.2
F −0.6

Difference in percentage points.

2.2% withdrew · 12 of 539 enrolled.

Sriram Sankaranarayanan 172 grades · 1 term 3.41GPA
69.2% A
17.4% B
6.4% C
0.0% D
7.0% F

172 letter grades

Compare with the course
Sankaranarayanan vs. the course average
A +6.3
B −7.2
C −1.6
D −1.2
F +3.7

Difference in percentage points.

3.9% withdrew · 7 of 179 enrolled.

Rhonda Olcott Hoenigman 321 grades · 1 term 3.23GPA
49.5% A
34.0% B
11.2% C
1.6% D
3.7% F

321 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hoenigman vs. the course average
A −13.4
B +9.3
C +3.2
D +0.4
F +0.5

Difference in percentage points.

3.9% withdrew · 13 of 334 enrolled.

Christoffer R Heckman 54 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

54 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.40
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Rachel Suzanne Tutmaher 115 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5

115 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.09
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration3.46
Connection4.21
Contribution3.58
Discussion4.01
Inclusivity3.55
Grading3.84
Reflection4.21
Respect4.45
Creativity4.17
Feedback3.60
Interaction3.96
Challenge4.40
Questions4.13
Christopher Keith Godley 29 reported responses 3.62Eval / 5
Overall3.62 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.30
Connection3.90
Contribution3.40
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.10
Reflection3.60
Respect4.60
Creativity3.40
Feedback3.10
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.80
Questions3.80
Jim Dykes 158 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

158 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration3.65
Connection4.42
Contribution3.98
Discussion4.27
Inclusivity4.12
Grading4.45
Reflection4.23
Respect4.60
Creativity4.29
Feedback3.99
Interaction4.17
Challenge4.25
Questions4.45
Travis Hainsworth 4 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.94
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.89
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.94
Contribution4.98
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity1.21
Grading4.81
Reflection4.94
Respect4.94
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.94
Questions4.94
Show all 11 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.