Course record CSCI
CSCI 3202
Introduction to Artificial Intelligence
University of Colorado Boulder
1,465 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score34/100
Below average
Zachary Kidder Mullen 162 grades · 1 term 3.50GPA
162 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mullen vs. the course average
A
+5.6
B
−3.7
C
−0.6
D
+0.1
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
1.8% withdrew · 3 of 165 enrolled.
Overall4.14 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.10
Connection4.30
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.10
Reflection4.20
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.50
Questions4.30
James E Dykes 283 grades · 1 term 3.49GPA
283 letter grades
Compare with the course
Dykes vs. the course average
A
+2.8
B
+1.2
C
−3.0
D
−0.1
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
1.0% withdrew · 3 of 286 enrolled.
Rachel Suzanne-Tutmaher Cox 527 grades · 1 term 3.45GPA
527 letter grades
Compare with the course
Cox vs. the course average
A
+2.9
B
−2.8
C
+0.4
D
+0.2
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
2.2% withdrew · 12 of 539 enrolled.
Sriram Sankaranarayanan 172 grades · 1 term 3.41GPA
172 letter grades
Compare with the course
Sankaranarayanan vs. the course average
A
+6.3
B
−7.2
C
−1.6
D
−1.2
F
+3.7
Difference in percentage points.
3.9% withdrew · 7 of 179 enrolled.
Overall4.45 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.40
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Rhonda Olcott Hoenigman 321 grades · 1 term 3.23GPA
321 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hoenigman vs. the course average
A
−13.4
B
+9.3
C
+3.2
D
+0.4
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
3.9% withdrew · 13 of 334 enrolled.
Overall3.84 / 5
68 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.87
Technology4.13
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.10
Connection4.07
Contribution3.33
Discussion4.03
Inclusivity3.13
Grading3.67
Reflection3.97
Respect4.27
Creativity3.77
Feedback3.43
Interaction4.03
Challenge4.23
Questions3.90
Christoffer R Heckman 54 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.40
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Rachel Suzanne Tutmaher 115 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
115 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.09
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration3.46
Connection4.21
Contribution3.58
Discussion4.01
Inclusivity3.55
Grading3.84
Reflection4.21
Respect4.45
Creativity4.17
Feedback3.60
Interaction3.96
Challenge4.40
Questions4.13
Christopher Keith Godley 29 reported responses 3.62Eval / 5
Overall3.62 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.30
Connection3.90
Contribution3.40
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.10
Reflection3.60
Respect4.60
Creativity3.40
Feedback3.10
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.80
Questions3.80
Jim Dykes 158 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5
158 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration3.65
Connection4.42
Contribution3.98
Discussion4.27
Inclusivity4.12
Grading4.45
Reflection4.23
Respect4.60
Creativity4.29
Feedback3.99
Interaction4.17
Challenge4.25
Questions4.45
Travis Hainsworth 4 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.94
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.89
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.94
Contribution4.98
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity1.21
Grading4.81
Reflection4.94
Respect4.94
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.94
Questions4.94
Al Pisano 1 reported responses 3.35Eval / 5
Overall3.35 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology2.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity1.00
Feedback2.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.00
Questions4.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.