Course record CSCI

CSCI 3022

Introduction to Data Science with Probability and Statistics

University of Colorado Boulder

1,569 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score23/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 10

Zachary Kidder Mullen 548 grades · 1 term 3.09GPA
47.8% A
29.9% B
13.5% C
2.6% D
6.2% F

548 letter grades

Compare with the course
Mullen vs. the course average
A +7.7
B −1.6
C −4.2
D −1.3
F −0.5

Difference in percentage points.

9.0% withdrew · 54 of 602 enrolled.

Murray William Cox 175 grades · 1 term 3.03GPA
51.4% A
21.7% B
13.7% C
6.3% D
6.9% F

175 letter grades

Compare with the course
Cox vs. the course average
A +11.3
B −9.8
C −4.0
D +2.4
F +0.2

Difference in percentage points.

11.2% withdrew · 22 of 197 enrolled.

David Philp Quigley 106 grades · 1 term 3.02GPA
46.2% A
29.2% B
16.0% C
1.9% D
6.6% F

106 letter grades

Compare with the course
Quigley vs. the course average
A +6.1
B −2.3
C −1.7
D −2.0
F −0.1

Difference in percentage points.

7.8% withdrew · 9 of 115 enrolled.

Rachel Suzanne-Tutmaher Cox 167 grades · 1 term 2.93GPA
32.3% A
36.5% B
26.9% C
1.8% D
2.4% F

167 letter grades

Compare with the course
Cox vs. the course average
A −7.8
B +5.0
C +9.2
D −2.1
F −4.3

Difference in percentage points.

8.7% withdrew · 16 of 183 enrolled.

Maribeth Bleymaier Oscamou 573 grades · 1 term 2.73GPA
30.5% A
35.1% B
20.6% C
5.4% D
8.4% F

573 letter grades

Compare with the course
Oscamou vs. the course average
A −9.6
B +3.5
C +2.9
D +1.5
F +1.7

Difference in percentage points.

4.8% withdrew · 29 of 602 enrolled.

Rachel Suzanne Tutmaher 6 reported responses 3.70Eval / 5
Overall3.70 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration2.80
Connection3.80
Contribution3.00
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity2.30
Grading3.70
Reflection3.70
Respect4.70
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.50
Questions3.70
Jesse Pisel 1 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading3.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Michael P Llerandi 3 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.30
Nick Hunkins 72 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

72 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.20
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.83
Contribution2.95
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.05
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Osita Eluemuno Onyejekwe 14 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.08
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.02
Collaboration4.03
Connection4.07
Contribution4.22
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity3.71
Grading4.67
Reflection4.73
Respect4.76
Creativity4.51
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.93
Questions4.14
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.