Course record CSCI
CSCI 3010
Intensive Programming Workshop
University of Colorado Boulder
351 grades6 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score20/100
Below average
Sreesha Saseendra Nath 237 grades · 1 term 3.04GPA
237 letter grades
Compare with the course
Nath vs. the course average
A
+0.2
B
−0.3
C
+0.5
D
−0.2
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
10.2% withdrew · 27 of 264 enrolled.
Overall4.28 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.25
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.12
Grading4.43
Reflection4.58
Respect4.79
Creativity4.81
Feedback3.72
Interaction4.27
Challenge4.73
Questions4.69
Felix Alder Ellen Muzny 38 grades · 1 term 3.04GPA
38 letter grades
Compare with the course
Muzny vs. the course average
A
+3.0
B
+0.7
C
−3.7
D
+0.4
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
15.6% withdrew · 7 of 45 enrolled.
Supriya Manikonda Keshavaiah Naidu 60 grades · 1 term 2.78GPA
60 letter grades
Compare with the course
Naidu vs. the course average
A
−10.3
B
+2.7
C
+4.9
D
+1.8
F
+1.0
Difference in percentage points.
6.3% withdrew · 4 of 64 enrolled.
Overall4.11 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.22
Synthesis3.42
Collaboration4.01
Connection3.33
Contribution4.01
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.39
Grading3.33
Reflection3.33
Respect4.02
Creativity3.73
Feedback3.03
Interaction3.92
Challenge3.54
Questions3.81
John M Gerzso 16 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.49GPA
16 letter grades · Limited sample
11.1% withdrew · 2 of 18 enrolled.
Overall3.93 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.43
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.87
Collaboration3.43
Connection4.22
Contribution4.94
Discussion4.22
Inclusivity4.09
Grading3.43
Reflection3.43
Respect2.78
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.22
Interaction2.71
Challenge4.15
Questions4.94
Julie Jarzemsky 3 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.30
Connection3.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.30
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Katherine Elizabeth Nielsen 1 reported responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity1.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback2.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.