Course record CSCI
CSCI 2824
Discrete Structures
University of Colorado Boulder
2,094 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score10/100
Needs work
Zachary Kidder Mullen 248 grades · 1 term 3.01GPA
248 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mullen vs. the course average
A
−4.5
B
+8.9
C
+4.7
D
−1.5
F
−7.5
Difference in percentage points.
6.4% withdrew · 17 of 265 enrolled.
Rachel Suzanne-Tutmaher Cox 379 grades · 1 term 2.99GPA
379 letter grades
Compare with the course
Cox vs. the course average
A
+0.9
B
+3.0
C
+0.8
D
−3.2
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
6.7% withdrew · 27 of 406 enrolled.
Murray William Cox 1,310 grades · 1 term 2.85GPA
1,310 letter grades
Compare with the course
Cox vs. the course average
A
+0.6
B
−1.6
C
−0.4
D
+0.1
F
+1.3
Difference in percentage points.
6.2% withdrew · 86 of 1,396 enrolled.
Overall4.05 / 5
428 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.15
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration2.90
Connection3.50
Contribution3.63
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity3.22
Grading3.95
Reflection3.65
Respect4.37
Creativity3.84
Feedback3.23
Interaction3.84
Challenge4.06
Questions4.16
Maribeth Bleymaier Oscamou 157 grades · 1 term 2.67GPA
157 letter grades
Compare with the course
Oscamou vs. the course average
A
same
B
−7.5
C
−5.9
D
+8.9
F
+4.5
Difference in percentage points.
4.3% withdrew · 7 of 164 enrolled.
Overall4.27 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.60
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.30
Reflection4.20
Respect4.60
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.30
Rachel Suzanne Tutmaher 79 reported responses 3.85Eval / 5
Overall3.85 / 5
79 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration2.40
Connection4.17
Contribution3.27
Discussion3.97
Inclusivity3.73
Grading3.63
Reflection4.20
Respect4.43
Creativity4.17
Feedback3.43
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.23
Questions4.27
Steven Kordonowy 5 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.40
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity2.30
Grading3.80
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback2.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.20
Elizabeth Spaulding 6 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Aaron Gluck 28 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology3.40
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.10
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity2.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.50
Questions4.40
Benjamin F Waggoner 23 reported responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration2.60
Connection3.80
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.00
Reflection4.10
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.20
Questions4.20
Divya E. Vernerey 10 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.20
Contribution4.11
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity3.69
Grading4.84
Reflection4.55
Respect4.80
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.88
Questions4.78
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.