Course record CSCI
CSCI 2400
Computer Systems
University of Colorado Boulder
2,674 grades55 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score24/100
Below average
David Allen Knox 215 grades · 1 term 3.15GPA
215 letter grades
Compare with the course
Knox vs. the course average
A
+11.1
B
−4.8
C
−6.0
D
−1.5
F
+1.2
Difference in percentage points.
7.7% withdrew · 18 of 233 enrolled.
Overall3.87 / 5
75 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration3.15
Connection3.95
Contribution3.50
Discussion3.95
Inclusivity3.35
Grading3.95
Reflection4.10
Respect4.40
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.40
Interaction3.85
Challenge4.15
Questions4.20
Christopher Keith Godley 405 grades · 1 term 3.10GPA
405 letter grades
Compare with the course
Godley vs. the course average
A
+1.0
B
+2.9
C
−2.6
D
+0.5
F
−1.8
Difference in percentage points.
3.3% withdrew · 14 of 419 enrolled.
Overall3.98 / 5
127 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.92
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration3.16
Connection4.29
Contribution3.87
Discussion4.19
Inclusivity3.56
Grading4.11
Reflection4.34
Respect4.49
Creativity4.08
Feedback3.25
Interaction4.07
Challenge4.27
Questions4.18
Hoang Le Truong 111 grades · 1 term 3.07GPA
111 letter grades
Compare with the course
Truong vs. the course average
A
+5.0
B
−2.2
C
−3.1
D
+0.7
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
11.9% withdrew · 15 of 126 enrolled.
Overall4.07 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.62
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.11
Collaboration2.92
Connection3.82
Contribution3.57
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity3.14
Grading4.18
Reflection4.07
Respect4.80
Creativity4.25
Feedback3.88
Interaction3.94
Challenge4.20
Questions4.61
Maciej J Zagrodzki 1,448 grades · 1 term 3.04GPA
1,448 letter grades
Compare with the course
Zagrodzki vs. the course average
A
+2.4
B
−1.2
C
−0.8
D
−0.4
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
6.0% withdrew · 93 of 1,541 enrolled.
Overall4.01 / 5
431 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration3.58
Connection4.35
Contribution3.88
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity4.04
Grading4.31
Reflection4.24
Respect4.79
Creativity4.44
Feedback3.66
Interaction4.19
Challenge4.40
Questions4.37
Henry Tufo 113 grades · 1 term 2.97GPA
113 letter grades
Compare with the course
Tufo vs. the course average
A
−8.2
B
+7.8
C
+2.0
D
+1.5
F
−3.1
Difference in percentage points.
11.0% withdrew · 14 of 127 enrolled.
Overall3.94 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.76
Technology4.39
Synthesis4.02
Collaboration3.63
Connection4.19
Contribution3.59
Discussion4.26
Inclusivity3.63
Grading3.74
Reflection4.35
Respect4.58
Creativity4.21
Feedback3.39
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.36
Questions4.13
Dirk C Grunwald 382 grades · 1 term 2.67GPA
382 letter grades
Compare with the course
Grunwald vs. the course average
A
−15.4
B
+2.5
C
+9.6
D
+1.0
F
+2.3
Difference in percentage points.
9.0% withdrew · 38 of 420 enrolled.
Overall3.85 / 5
153 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.77
Technology4.39
Synthesis3.77
Collaboration3.08
Connection4.16
Contribution3.46
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.19
Grading4.20
Reflection3.89
Respect4.49
Creativity4.28
Feedback3.32
Interaction3.98
Challenge4.09
Questions3.99
Zhiyuan Liu 23 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.81
Technology4.43
Synthesis3.91
Collaboration2.88
Connection3.78
Contribution3.25
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity3.27
Grading4.22
Reflection3.89
Respect4.83
Creativity3.51
Feedback4.02
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.35
Questions4.32
Siqi Chen 17 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration3.72
Connection4.13
Contribution3.72
Discussion4.44
Inclusivity4.04
Grading4.52
Reflection4.57
Respect4.54
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.69
Interaction4.38
Challenge4.61
Questions4.62
Dylan Fox 19 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration3.56
Connection4.66
Contribution4.12
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.14
Grading4.58
Reflection4.71
Respect4.95
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.58
Questions4.54
Hamza Motiwalla 29 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.04
Connection4.33
Contribution4.18
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.68
Grading4.57
Reflection4.55
Respect5.00
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.