Course record CSCI

CSCI 2400

Computer Systems

University of Colorado Boulder

2,674 grades55 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score24/100
Below average

Professors 55 of 55

David Allen Knox 215 grades · 1 term 3.15GPA
51.2% A
32.6% B
7.9% C
1.4% D
7.0% F

215 letter grades

Compare with the course
Knox vs. the course average
A +11.1
B −4.8
C −6.0
D −1.5
F +1.2

Difference in percentage points.

7.7% withdrew · 18 of 233 enrolled.

Christopher Keith Godley 405 grades · 1 term 3.10GPA
41.0% A
40.2% B
11.4% C
3.5% D
4.0% F

405 letter grades

Compare with the course
Godley vs. the course average
A +1.0
B +2.9
C −2.6
D +0.5
F −1.8

Difference in percentage points.

3.3% withdrew · 14 of 419 enrolled.

Hoang Le Truong 111 grades · 1 term 3.07GPA
45.0% A
35.1% B
10.8% C
3.6% D
5.4% F

111 letter grades

Compare with the course
Truong vs. the course average
A +5.0
B −2.2
C −3.1
D +0.7
F −0.4

Difference in percentage points.

11.9% withdrew · 15 of 126 enrolled.

Maciej J Zagrodzki 1,448 grades · 1 term 3.04GPA
42.4% A
36.1% B
13.1% C
2.6% D
5.8% F

1,448 letter grades

Compare with the course
Zagrodzki vs. the course average
A +2.4
B −1.2
C −0.8
D −0.4
F same

Difference in percentage points.

6.0% withdrew · 93 of 1,541 enrolled.

Henry Tufo 113 grades · 1 term 2.97GPA
31.9% A
45.1% B
15.9% C
4.4% D
2.7% F

113 letter grades

Compare with the course
Tufo vs. the course average
A −8.2
B +7.8
C +2.0
D +1.5
F −3.1

Difference in percentage points.

11.0% withdrew · 14 of 127 enrolled.

Dirk C Grunwald 382 grades · 1 term 2.67GPA
24.6% A
39.8% B
23.6% C
3.9% D
8.1% F

382 letter grades

Compare with the course
Grunwald vs. the course average
A −15.4
B +2.5
C +9.6
D +1.0
F +2.3

Difference in percentage points.

9.0% withdrew · 38 of 420 enrolled.

Zhiyuan Liu 23 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.81
Technology4.43
Synthesis3.91
Collaboration2.88
Connection3.78
Contribution3.25
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity3.27
Grading4.22
Reflection3.89
Respect4.83
Creativity3.51
Feedback4.02
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.35
Questions4.32
Siqi Chen 17 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration3.72
Connection4.13
Contribution3.72
Discussion4.44
Inclusivity4.04
Grading4.52
Reflection4.57
Respect4.54
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.69
Interaction4.38
Challenge4.61
Questions4.62
Dylan Fox 19 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration3.56
Connection4.66
Contribution4.12
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.14
Grading4.58
Reflection4.71
Respect4.95
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.58
Questions4.54
Hamza Motiwalla 29 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.04
Connection4.33
Contribution4.18
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.68
Grading4.57
Reflection4.55
Respect5.00
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Tae Ho Kim 41 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

41 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.26
Collaboration3.31
Connection3.58
Contribution3.37
Discussion3.82
Inclusivity2.47
Grading4.87
Reflection4.35
Respect4.57
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.56
Interaction3.94
Challenge4.47
Questions4.91
James Watson 14 reported responses 3.76Eval / 5
Overall3.76 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration2.90
Connection3.60
Contribution3.10
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity2.90
Grading3.60
Reflection3.90
Respect4.40
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.20
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.30
Questions4.40
Amatullah Fakhruddin Sethjiwala 8 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.00
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Stephane Tomas Aroca-Ouellette 19 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.29
Connection4.62
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.93
Reflection4.78
Respect4.98
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.88
Questions4.95
Sepideh Goodarzy 28 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.94
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration3.45
Connection4.42
Contribution4.09
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.36
Reflection4.71
Respect4.97
Creativity4.74
Feedback3.76
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.38
Questions4.71
Yi-Shiuan Tung 12 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Shazal Irshad 6 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.00
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.00
Questions4.50
Truong Le Hoang 33 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

33 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.45
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.78
Reflection4.57
Respect4.83
Creativity4.81
Feedback4.51
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.51
Questions4.68
Insoo Lee 28 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.78
Connection3.62
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.85
Reflection4.71
Respect4.97
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.56
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.76
Questions4.90
Amit Kiran Rege 2 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Hyoyoung Lim 32 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

32 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.35
Technology4.59
Synthesis3.94
Collaboration3.47
Connection3.83
Contribution3.57
Discussion3.83
Inclusivity3.34
Grading4.57
Reflection4.06
Respect4.98
Creativity4.02
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.41
Challenge4.18
Questions3.58
Suresh Narasimha Nayak 34 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.61
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.85
Reflection4.87
Respect4.94
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.86
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.80
Questions4.92
Nishant Bhattacharya 74 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

74 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration3.61
Connection3.91
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.04
Grading4.32
Reflection4.47
Respect4.78
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.44
Interaction4.36
Challenge4.61
Questions4.82
Xinyu Cao 6 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.20
Connection3.20
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect4.60
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.30
Questions4.80
Aurangzeb Waseem Malik 8 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.30
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.90
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Jae Young Oh 52 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

52 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.44
Connection4.92
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.98
Reflection4.88
Respect4.91
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.41
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.52
Questions4.90
Chanheum Park 6 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.54
Contribution4.77
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Rhett Cole Hanscom 24 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.18
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.83
Grading5.00
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Jinpeng Miao 2 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Sandesh Dhawaskar Sathyanarayana 20 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration4.03
Connection4.28
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.03
Grading4.46
Reflection4.45
Respect4.64
Creativity4.28
Feedback4.34
Interaction4.36
Challenge4.47
Questions4.40
Charles Robert Hoots 13 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.80
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.80
Reflection4.00
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.90
Questions4.50
Ava Abderezaei 17 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.99
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.26
Collaboration3.70
Connection3.70
Contribution4.19
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.62
Reflection4.32
Respect4.84
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.18
Interaction4.46
Challenge4.34
Questions4.43
Sagar Santosh Pathare 21 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.90
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Gopala Krishna Vasanth Kanugo 4 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Ashutosh Naik 11 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.39
Collaboration3.22
Connection4.01
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity4.77
Grading5.00
Reflection4.03
Respect4.95
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.85
Questions4.85
Denzil Bilson 65 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

65 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.34
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity3.98
Grading4.96
Reflection4.79
Respect4.97
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.74
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.88
Questions4.84
Aashish Mukund 13 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.54
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity4.36
Grading4.81
Reflection4.78
Respect4.63
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.56
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.81
Questions4.80
Pawan Ranjith Muthaiah Subramanian 18 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.39
Connection4.33
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.84
Reflection4.72
Respect4.90
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.59
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.77
Questions4.64
Rohit Taware 19 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.07
Connection4.57
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.83
Reflection4.65
Respect4.95
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.44
Challenge4.62
Questions4.85
Meysam Varasteh 26 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.27
Synthesis4.08
Collaboration3.64
Connection3.63
Contribution3.84
Discussion3.97
Inclusivity4.07
Grading4.44
Reflection4.01
Respect4.36
Creativity4.14
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.16
Challenge3.88
Questions4.16
Naren Sivagnanadasan 15 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.22
Contribution4.42
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.65
Reflection4.55
Respect4.81
Creativity4.54
Feedback4.64
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.53
Questions4.79
Nick Cooper 8 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.30
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.20
Questions4.90
Yutong Zhang 7 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.40
Connection3.70
Contribution3.30
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.60
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.10
Questions4.30
Manasvi Parikh 35 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

35 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration3.72
Connection4.00
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.90
Reflection4.52
Respect4.87
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.68
Questions4.77
Alireza Nadali 3 reported responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Junhong Min 24 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.88
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.50
Connection3.34
Contribution3.54
Discussion4.14
Inclusivity3.59
Grading4.27
Reflection4.11
Respect4.84
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.11
Challenge4.43
Questions4.15
Jay Vakil 4 reported responses 3.23Eval / 5
Overall3.23 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration1.80
Connection2.80
Contribution3.20
Discussion3.20
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.50
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity3.30
Feedback2.50
Interaction3.00
Challenge3.00
Questions3.50
Max Conway 13 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.60
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.60
Woongsub Shin 10 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.90
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Sara Daneshvar 5 reported responses 3.87Eval / 5
Overall3.87 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology3.25
Synthesis3.25
Collaboration3.35
Connection4.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.00
Reflection3.25
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.25
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.15
Questions3.25
Patrick Cooper 5 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.50
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.60
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Pedro Kasprzykowski 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Dhanush Kumar Varma Penmetsa 6 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration3.20
Connection4.20
Contribution3.30
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.00
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.00
Questions4.30
Sangtae Ha 28 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.20
Connection4.10
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.00
Reflection4.10
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Aritra Chakrabarty 11 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.88
Contribution4.98
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.95
Grading5.00
Reflection4.95
Respect4.98
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.98
Questions5.00
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.