Course record CSCI

CSCI 2275

Programming and Data Structures

University of Colorado Boulder

125 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score47/100
Mixed record

Professors 10 of 11

Maciej J Zagrodzki 91 grades · 1 term 3.55GPA
75.8% A
16.5% B
2.2% C
1.1% D
4.4% F

91 letter grades

Compare with the course
Zagrodzki vs. the course average
A +0.6
B −1.1
C −0.2
D +0.3
F +0.4

Difference in percentage points.

1.1% withdrew · 1 of 92 enrolled.

Rhonda Olcott Hoenigman 34 grades · 1 term 3.55GPA
73.5% A
20.6% B
2.9% C
0.0% D
2.9% F

34 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hoenigman vs. the course average
A −1.7
B +3.0
C +0.5
D −0.8
F −1.1

Difference in percentage points.

8.1% withdrew · 3 of 37 enrolled.

Jared C Jewell 4 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.30
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Ryan Dalton 6 reported responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration2.70
Connection3.50
Contribution3.30
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.40
Reflection4.00
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.20
Interaction3.30
Challenge4.20
Questions4.80
Seok Jun Song 6 reported responses 3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration2.70
Connection3.50
Contribution3.30
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.20
Reflection4.00
Respect4.70
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.20
Interaction3.30
Challenge4.00
Questions4.50
Abhidip Bhattacharyya 14 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.45
Connection3.35
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity2.95
Grading4.75
Reflection4.50
Respect4.85
Creativity3.85
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.20
Questions4.85
Michelle Tran 16 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.75
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.70
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity2.25
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.75
Sourav Chakraborty 13 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.06
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.16
Connection4.10
Contribution4.28
Discussion4.49
Inclusivity3.23
Grading3.77
Reflection4.21
Respect4.49
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.28
Questions4.32
Spencer David Wilson 24 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.20
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.70
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Morgan Emily Byers 19 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.10
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.40
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Show all 11 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.