Course record CSCI
CSCI 2270
Computer Science 2: Data Structures
University of Colorado Boulder
3,341 grades86 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score22/100
Below average
Maciej J Zagrodzki 745 grades · 1 term 3.18GPA
745 letter grades
Compare with the course
Zagrodzki vs. the course average
A
+9.2
B
−6.5
C
−2.1
D
−0.4
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
5.7% withdrew · 45 of 790 enrolled.
Overall3.96 / 5
218 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.98
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.46
Connection3.81
Contribution3.66
Discussion4.26
Inclusivity3.46
Grading4.03
Reflection3.91
Respect4.60
Creativity4.31
Feedback3.28
Interaction3.83
Challenge4.10
Questions4.02
Ashutosh Trivedi 827 grades · 1 term 3.08GPA
827 letter grades
Compare with the course
Trivedi vs. the course average
A
+0.6
B
−0.6
C
+0.9
D
−0.1
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
7.1% withdrew · 63 of 890 enrolled.
Overall4.17 / 5
217 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.97
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.02
Collaboration3.16
Connection4.10
Contribution3.52
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.68
Grading4.21
Reflection4.16
Respect4.58
Creativity4.35
Feedback3.51
Interaction4.16
Challenge4.30
Questions4.11
Asa M Ashraf 1,669 grades · 1 term 2.99GPA
1,669 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ashraf vs. the course average
A
−4.0
B
+3.0
C
+0.2
D
+0.2
F
+0.6
Difference in percentage points.
6.3% withdrew · 113 of 1,782 enrolled.
Overall4.00 / 5
567 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.09
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.19
Collaboration3.86
Connection4.22
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity3.56
Grading4.38
Reflection4.31
Respect4.46
Creativity4.39
Feedback3.51
Interaction4.29
Challenge4.40
Questions4.29
Christopher Keith Godley 100 grades · 1 term 2.97GPA
100 letter grades
Compare with the course
Godley vs. the course average
A
−7.4
B
+2.7
C
+4.7
D
+1.2
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
10.7% withdrew · 12 of 112 enrolled.
Overall3.81 / 5
129 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.47
Technology3.76
Synthesis3.74
Collaboration2.96
Connection3.42
Contribution3.15
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.47
Grading3.82
Reflection3.64
Respect4.20
Creativity3.97
Feedback2.78
Interaction3.92
Challenge3.77
Questions3.66
James Luther 8 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Raj Gopal Chandak 6 reported responses 3.93Eval / 5
Overall3.93 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.20
Technology4.80
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration2.40
Connection3.20
Contribution3.00
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.80
Reflection4.00
Respect4.70
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.80
Interaction3.00
Challenge4.40
Questions5.00
Abhidip Bhattacharyya 24 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration3.35
Connection3.82
Contribution4.12
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity3.94
Grading4.55
Reflection4.38
Respect4.99
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.39
Interaction4.21
Challenge4.38
Questions4.71
Meeti Baliga 21 reported responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration2.97
Connection3.94
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.74
Grading4.00
Reflection4.45
Respect4.79
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.35
Interaction3.70
Challenge4.32
Questions4.47
Lucy Bowes Van Kleunen 43 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.14
Collaboration3.76
Connection4.26
Contribution3.86
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity3.42
Grading4.54
Reflection4.44
Respect4.78
Creativity4.36
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.05
Challenge4.36
Questions4.66
Owen Martin 25 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.97
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.29
Connection4.35
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.33
Reflection4.68
Respect4.88
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.80
Questions4.72
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.