Course record CSCI

CSCI 2270

Computer Science 2: Data Structures

University of Colorado Boulder

3,341 grades86 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score22/100
Below average

Professors 86 of 86

Maciej J Zagrodzki 745 grades · 1 term 3.18GPA
58.7% A
20.8% B
8.2% C
5.4% D
7.0% F

745 letter grades

Compare with the course
Zagrodzki vs. the course average
A +9.2
B −6.5
C −2.1
D −0.4
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

5.7% withdrew · 45 of 790 enrolled.

Ashutosh Trivedi 827 grades · 1 term 3.08GPA
50.1% A
26.7% B
11.1% C
5.7% D
6.4% F

827 letter grades

Compare with the course
Trivedi vs. the course average
A +0.6
B −0.6
C +0.9
D −0.1
F −0.8

Difference in percentage points.

7.1% withdrew · 63 of 890 enrolled.

Asa M Ashraf 1,669 grades · 1 term 2.99GPA
45.4% A
30.3% B
10.5% C
6.0% D
7.8% F

1,669 letter grades

Compare with the course
Ashraf vs. the course average
A −4.0
B +3.0
C +0.2
D +0.2
F +0.6

Difference in percentage points.

6.3% withdrew · 113 of 1,782 enrolled.

Christopher Keith Godley 100 grades · 1 term 2.97GPA
42.0% A
30.0% B
15.0% C
7.0% D
6.0% F

100 letter grades

Compare with the course
Godley vs. the course average
A −7.4
B +2.7
C +4.7
D +1.2
F −1.2

Difference in percentage points.

10.7% withdrew · 12 of 112 enrolled.

James Luther 8 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Raj Gopal Chandak 6 reported responses 3.93Eval / 5
Overall3.93 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.20
Technology4.80
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration2.40
Connection3.20
Contribution3.00
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.80
Reflection4.00
Respect4.70
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.80
Interaction3.00
Challenge4.40
Questions5.00
Abhidip Bhattacharyya 24 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration3.35
Connection3.82
Contribution4.12
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity3.94
Grading4.55
Reflection4.38
Respect4.99
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.39
Interaction4.21
Challenge4.38
Questions4.71
Meeti Baliga 21 reported responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration2.97
Connection3.94
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.74
Grading4.00
Reflection4.45
Respect4.79
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.35
Interaction3.70
Challenge4.32
Questions4.47
Lucy Bowes Van Kleunen 43 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

43 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.14
Collaboration3.76
Connection4.26
Contribution3.86
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity3.42
Grading4.54
Reflection4.44
Respect4.78
Creativity4.36
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.05
Challenge4.36
Questions4.66
Owen Martin 25 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.97
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.29
Connection4.35
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.33
Reflection4.68
Respect4.88
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.80
Questions4.72
Himanshu Gupta 21 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration3.05
Connection4.43
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity3.10
Grading4.47
Reflection4.90
Respect4.97
Creativity4.93
Feedback3.82
Interaction4.46
Challenge4.92
Questions4.93
Saumya Sinha 9 reported responses 3.76Eval / 5
Overall3.76 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration2.70
Connection3.80
Contribution3.70
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity2.30
Grading3.40
Reflection4.30
Respect4.40
Creativity3.30
Feedback4.00
Interaction3.30
Challenge4.00
Questions4.10
Yoshinari Fujinuma 10 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.79
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration3.02
Connection4.79
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.98
Reflection4.91
Respect4.95
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.86
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.95
Questions4.95
Dheeraj Mulbagal Ravindranath 15 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.02
Technology3.65
Synthesis4.02
Collaboration3.02
Connection4.14
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.16
Inclusivity3.62
Grading3.39
Reflection4.70
Respect4.35
Creativity3.39
Feedback4.14
Interaction3.46
Challenge3.60
Questions4.12
Ananya Ganesh 4 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.30
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Sanskar Katiyar 6 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.75
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.75
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.25
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Aditi Prakash 5 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.15
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration3.65
Connection3.65
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.85
Respect4.75
Creativity4.35
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.35
Saiyma Sarmin 25 reported responses 3.72Eval / 5
Overall3.72 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.48
Technology3.95
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration3.50
Connection3.35
Contribution3.40
Discussion4.23
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.52
Reflection4.03
Respect4.57
Creativity4.13
Feedback3.43
Interaction3.72
Challenge3.60
Questions3.98
Wyatt Jackson Rees 11 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration3.95
Connection3.90
Contribution3.45
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity2.90
Grading4.25
Reflection4.65
Respect4.60
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.10
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.65
Questions4.95
Yichen Wang 23 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.57
Technology4.75
Synthesis3.73
Collaboration2.62
Connection3.66
Contribution3.31
Discussion4.23
Inclusivity4.04
Grading4.66
Reflection3.95
Respect4.78
Creativity4.14
Feedback3.87
Interaction4.09
Challenge3.94
Questions4.52
Jingwei Li 17 reported responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.67
Technology4.23
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration3.57
Connection3.90
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity2.93
Grading3.90
Reflection4.10
Respect4.63
Creativity3.67
Feedback3.13
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.03
Questions4.50
Guohui Ding 10 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.85
Contribution3.70
Discussion3.85
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.55
Reflection4.20
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.15
Interaction3.70
Challenge4.15
Questions4.50
Krishna Sai Chemudupati 8 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration3.57
Connection4.40
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity3.25
Grading4.23
Reflection4.77
Respect4.53
Creativity4.43
Feedback3.93
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.83
Questions4.90
Pragna Mandadi 5 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.15
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.40
Reflection3.65
Respect4.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Julia Romero 11 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.11
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.38
Contribution4.29
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.23
Grading4.37
Reflection5.00
Respect4.85
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.75
Questions4.68
Trevor Grant 4 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity2.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity3.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Chi-Hui Lin 3 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.30
Grading5.00
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.30
Medha Rudra 25 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.56
Connection4.41
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.79
Grading4.57
Reflection4.61
Respect4.96
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.74
Questions4.87
Shreyas Savanoor Ravindra 27 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.24
Collaboration4.14
Connection4.23
Contribution4.01
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity2.98
Grading3.99
Reflection4.37
Respect4.25
Creativity4.41
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.13
Challenge4.40
Questions4.42
Namratha Mysore Keshavaprakash 15 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.83
Technology4.39
Synthesis3.87
Collaboration3.54
Connection3.04
Contribution3.48
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity2.60
Grading3.98
Reflection3.87
Respect4.30
Creativity3.96
Feedback4.07
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.28
Questions4.50
Jerome Hoganson Gammie 9 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.10
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity1.00
Grading3.60
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.90
Questions4.60
Tzu-Chi Yen 14 reported responses 3.53Eval / 5
Overall3.53 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.10
Collaboration3.60
Connection3.10
Contribution2.90
Discussion3.60
Inclusivity2.40
Grading3.50
Reflection3.50
Respect4.50
Creativity3.10
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.10
Challenge3.30
Questions3.90
Hunar Jain 30 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.19
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.22
Connection4.31
Contribution4.14
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity3.89
Grading4.58
Reflection4.66
Respect4.87
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.71
Questions4.74
Sourav Chakraborty 55 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

55 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.36
Connection4.37
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.41
Grading4.47
Reflection4.73
Respect4.87
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.78
Questions4.81
Shravani Nindra 12 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.30
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect4.70
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Sagar Santosh Pathare 15 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.40
Reflection4.80
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Seonwoo Kim 14 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.22
Connection4.47
Contribution4.08
Discussion4.31
Inclusivity3.92
Grading4.38
Reflection4.39
Respect4.92
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.54
Questions4.77
Suresh Narasimha Nayak 4 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.70
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Charles Wade 27 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.49
Connection4.08
Contribution4.01
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.72
Reflection4.67
Respect4.82
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.65
Questions4.70
Josh Sun 11 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.00
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.50
Fei Hu 18 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.28
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration4.22
Connection3.95
Contribution3.82
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.68
Grading3.94
Reflection4.17
Respect4.77
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.31
Questions4.44
Utsav Atul Gupta 11 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.20
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Gopala Krishna Vasanth Kanugo 12 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.30
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Siva Pabbineedi 25 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.30
Connection3.70
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.10
Reflection4.40
Respect4.40
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.90
Questions4.60
Ali Marashian Saraei 18 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.20
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.20
Reflection4.30
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Jay Luther 17 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.20
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity2.80
Grading4.40
Reflection4.30
Respect4.50
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Akshit Johry 34 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.94
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.51
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.42
Grading4.59
Reflection4.68
Respect4.91
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.44
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.81
Questions4.85
Medha Sharma 8 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.10
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.40
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Sandesh Dhawaskar Sathyanarayana 6 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Aaron Gluck 31 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.34
Technology4.12
Synthesis3.88
Collaboration4.64
Connection3.20
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.24
Inclusivity3.12
Grading4.01
Reflection4.34
Respect4.23
Creativity4.26
Feedback3.82
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.46
Questions4.20
Neelima Prasad 36 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

36 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.29
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity3.87
Grading4.12
Reflection4.48
Respect4.86
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.54
Questions4.73
Tyler Gorman 26 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.34
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.58
Grading4.37
Reflection4.65
Respect4.59
Creativity3.98
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.65
Questions4.92
Ryan Quinlan 10 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.20
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity2.50
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect4.30
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Akshay Bakshi 44 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

44 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.24
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.29
Contribution4.26
Discussion4.49
Inclusivity3.74
Grading4.37
Reflection4.53
Respect4.47
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.59
Questions4.49
Rachna Konigari 14 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.70
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Vinay Nagalapura Ramesh 14 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.50
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect4.60
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.20
Questions4.80
Hemanth Rao Karade Nagendra 15 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.10
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Aashish Mukund 15 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.45
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.60
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.05
Reflection3.85
Respect4.70
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.65
Interaction4.15
Challenge4.05
Questions4.55
Behzod Mirpochoev 4 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.20
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Srikrishna Bangalore Raghu 21 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.10
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity3.95
Grading3.97
Reflection4.70
Respect4.78
Creativity4.51
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.61
Questions4.49
Shriprajwal Krishnamurthy 12 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.00
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.10
Reflection4.60
Respect4.50
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.50
Morgan Emily Byers 114 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

114 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.25
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.11
Grading4.75
Reflection4.76
Respect4.80
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.78
Questions4.91
Ren Stengel 8 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Mohammed Adib Oumer 10 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.60
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.40
Reflection4.10
Respect4.40
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.40
Questions4.20
Michael Ginn 12 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology3.75
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.15
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity2.69
Grading4.67
Reflection4.60
Respect4.67
Creativity4.47
Feedback3.21
Interaction4.32
Challenge4.05
Questions4.52
Aditya Chandra 9 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.60
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.60
Reflection4.30
Respect4.60
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.10
Questions4.70
Shih-Yu Ma 33 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

33 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.62
Synthesis3.87
Collaboration4.27
Connection3.64
Contribution3.87
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity3.28
Grading4.17
Reflection4.30
Respect4.67
Creativity4.19
Feedback3.93
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.15
Questions4.50
Akash Ramanathan 8 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.00
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.80
Grading3.80
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.10
Questions4.10
Ashwin Umadi 13 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.20
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.20
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Siddharth De 12 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.70
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Kushal Nagarajan 5 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.00
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.60
Respect4.20
Creativity4.80
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.80
Questions4.00
Ankur Varma 8 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Nishchal Shetty 3 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Melody Hsu 6 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.50
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.80
Reflection4.30
Respect4.40
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.00
Questions4.70
Abteen A Ebrahimi 22 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.40
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.30
Reflection4.80
Respect4.70
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Katherine Elizabeth Nielsen 67 reported responses 3.44Eval / 5
Overall3.44 / 5

67 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.33
Technology3.46
Synthesis3.31
Collaboration2.89
Connection2.97
Contribution3.12
Discussion3.92
Inclusivity2.67
Grading3.29
Reflection3.26
Respect4.22
Creativity3.49
Feedback2.54
Interaction3.54
Challenge3.38
Questions3.59
Victor Jimenez Rugama 30 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.14
Collaboration4.49
Connection3.94
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity4.46
Grading4.59
Reflection4.67
Respect4.69
Creativity4.36
Feedback4.26
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.54
Questions4.75
Yifan Tian 14 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.89
Technology4.55
Synthesis3.25
Collaboration4.64
Connection3.18
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity1.60
Grading3.23
Reflection4.07
Respect4.75
Creativity4.57
Feedback3.49
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.14
Questions4.66
Rahul Aedula 6 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.20
Reflection4.50
Respect4.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.30
Questions4.20
Arjun Ashok Rao 5 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.69
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.23
Connection3.77
Contribution4.46
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.77
Grading4.23
Reflection4.35
Respect5.00
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.46
Challenge4.77
Questions4.46
Dananjay Srinivas 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Stefano Fochesatto 6 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.23
Grading4.47
Reflection4.61
Respect5.00
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.84
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.61
Questions4.61
Hubery Hu 7 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity2.50
Grading3.40
Reflection4.00
Respect4.60
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.30
Questions4.90
Ishneet Chadha 7 reported responses 3.75Eval / 5
Overall3.75 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.60
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.60
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.40
Questions4.60
Murray William Cox 7 reported responses 3.49Eval / 5
Overall3.49 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration2.70
Connection4.00
Contribution2.90
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.00
Reflection4.10
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback2.00
Interaction3.40
Challenge4.10
Questions3.70
Mihir Shrestha 6 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.20
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.