Course record COMM
COMM 6200
Seminar: Selected Topics
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable11 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score81/100
Excellent
Tiara Rose Naputi 6 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.70
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Theodore G Striphas 10 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.30
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.20
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.90
Questions4.80
Joelle M Cruz 21 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.22
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.51
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.51
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Phaedra Carmen Pezzullo 4 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.30
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.50
Reflection4.00
Respect4.50
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.30
Questions4.30
Karen Lee Ashcraft 3 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Danielle Michelle Hodge 20 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.98
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.98
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.58
Reflection5.00
Respect4.91
Creativity4.91
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.98
Challenge5.00
Questions4.91
Amber Kelsie 3 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Matthew A. Koschmann 5 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Omedi Ochieng 7 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Jose Guadalupe Izaguirre 4 reported responses 4.99Eval / 5
Overall4.99 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.