Course record COMM
COMM 3340
Political Communication
University of Colorado Boulder
136 grades7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score32/100
Below average
Blessed E Ngoe 29 grades · 1 term 3.80GPA
29 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ngoe vs. the course average
A
+35.0
B
−18.8
C
−13.2
D
−1.5
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 29 enrolled.
Overall4.23 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.10
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.10
Questions3.90
Jeffrey Brian Motter 26 grades · 1 term 3.23GPA
26 letter grades
Compare with the course
Motter vs. the course average
A
−1.6
B
+2.4
C
−5.5
D
+6.2
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
3.7% withdrew · 1 of 27 enrolled.
Overall3.81 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology3.10
Synthesis3.92
Collaboration4.46
Connection3.77
Contribution3.90
Discussion3.44
Inclusivity4.46
Grading2.09
Reflection3.45
Respect3.93
Creativity3.86
Feedback2.38
Interaction3.92
Challenge3.60
Questions3.22
Jessica Ann Johnson 38 grades · 1 term 3.18GPA
38 letter grades
Compare with the course
Johnson vs. the course average
A
+7.5
B
−12.3
C
+2.6
D
−1.5
F
+3.8
Difference in percentage points.
2.6% withdrew · 1 of 39 enrolled.
Overall4.40 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.31
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.92
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.55
Reflection4.62
Respect4.69
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.07
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.38
Questions3.93
Marc H Rich 43 grades · 1 term 2.95GPA
43 letter grades
Compare with the course
Rich vs. the course average
A
−29.2
B
+22.1
C
+10.0
D
−1.5
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
8.5% withdrew · 4 of 47 enrolled.
Overall3.42 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.35
Synthesis3.91
Collaboration4.53
Connection3.86
Contribution4.22
Discussion3.85
Inclusivity4.07
Grading2.07
Reflection3.48
Respect4.02
Creativity3.93
Feedback2.47
Interaction4.06
Challenge3.78
Questions3.25
Elizabeth A Skewes 7 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.90
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Sunday De Los Santos 14 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology3.91
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration4.41
Connection4.81
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity4.81
Grading3.79
Reflection4.22
Respect4.65
Creativity3.83
Feedback3.66
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.06
Questions4.07
Cody J Walizer 13 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.