Course record COMM

COMM 3320

Persuasion in Society

University of Colorado Boulder

376 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score54/100
Mixed record

Professors 10 of 11

Cody J Walizer 28 grades · 1 term 3.70GPA
85.7% A
10.7% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
3.6% F

28 letter grades

Compare with the course
Walizer vs. the course average
A +34.9
B −24.7
C −10.1
D −2.9
F +2.8

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 28 enrolled.

Matthew A. Koschmann 271 grades · 1 term 3.24GPA
49.8% A
35.1% B
10.7% C
3.7% D
0.7% F

271 letter grades

Compare with the course
Koschmann vs. the course average
A −1.0
B −0.3
C +0.6
D +0.8
F −0.1

Difference in percentage points.

1.8% withdrew · 5 of 276 enrolled.

Michael Burns 77 grades · 1 term 3.23GPA
41.6% A
45.5% B
11.7% C
1.3% D
0.0% F

77 letter grades

Compare with the course
Burns vs. the course average
A −9.2
B +10.1
C +1.6
D −1.6
F −0.8

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 77 enrolled.

Malinda Dietrich 41 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

41 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.80
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.85
Reflection4.62
Respect4.95
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.60
Questions4.83
Tajshen Geneva Campbell 11 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology4.56
Synthesis3.87
Collaboration3.55
Connection4.37
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.49
Inclusivity4.44
Grading4.32
Reflection4.17
Respect4.87
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.53
Questions3.50
Jamie L Skerski 16 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.82
Collaboration4.14
Connection4.96
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.47
Reflection4.95
Respect4.98
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.96
Questions4.71
Brandon Daniels 3 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect4.30
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.30
Questions4.30
Sarah Keeton 2 reported responses 2.27Eval / 5
Overall2.27 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.50
Technology2.00
Synthesis2.50
Collaboration1.50
Connection3.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion2.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading2.00
Reflection2.50
Respect2.50
Creativity3.00
Feedback1.50
Interaction2.50
Challenge2.50
Questions1.50
Lisa Lorraine Poole 10 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.08
Technology4.08
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.85
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.23
Grading3.62
Reflection4.38
Respect4.85
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.38
Challenge4.62
Questions4.62
Mikayla Torres 5 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.40
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.20
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.20
Interaction3.80
Challenge4.20
Questions4.20
Show all 11 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.