Course record COMM
COMM 3000
Issues in Communication
University of Colorado Boulder
299 grades7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score51/100
Mixed record
Carey Brooke Candrian 43 grades · 1 term 3.52GPA
43 letter grades
Compare with the course
Candrian vs. the course average
A
+23.6
B
−21.2
C
−3.7
D
−0.3
F
+1.7
Difference in percentage points.
2.3% withdrew · 1 of 44 enrolled.
Overall4.57 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.84
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.48
Reflection4.50
Respect4.98
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.04
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.55
Questions4.82
Ruth Lynne Hickerson 27 grades · 1 term 3.46GPA
27 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hickerson vs. the course average
A
+20.5
B
−24.6
C
−2.3
D
+3.4
F
+3.0
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 27 enrolled.
Overall4.48 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.20
Reflection4.20
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Danielle Michelle Hodge 155 grades · 1 term 3.39GPA
155 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hodge vs. the course average
A
−4.2
B
+9.3
C
−4.1
D
−0.3
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 155 enrolled.
Overall4.81 / 5
128 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.08
Connection5.00
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.29
Reflection4.78
Respect4.79
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.34
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.98
Questions4.17
Peter D. Simonson 45 grades · 1 term 3.08GPA
45 letter grades
Compare with the course
Simonson vs. the course average
A
−15.0
B
+2.1
C
+14.0
D
−0.3
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
2.2% withdrew · 1 of 46 enrolled.
Overall4.82 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.44
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.57
Reflection5.00
Respect4.80
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.78
Questions4.65
Amber Kelsie 12 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.75GPA
12 letter grades · Limited sample
14.3% withdrew · 2 of 14 enrolled.
Overall3.82 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.30
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.10
Reflection4.00
Respect4.30
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.00
Questions3.30
Omedi Ochieng 17 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.86GPA
17 letter grades · Limited sample
5.6% withdrew · 1 of 18 enrolled.
Overall4.21 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.99
Collaboration4.99
Connection5.00
Contribution4.99
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.98
Reflection4.98
Respect4.99
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.98
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.98
Cody J Walizer 10 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.