Course record CMDP
CMDP 4900
Media Practices Capstone
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable16 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score76/100
Strong
Eric David Coombs Esmail 5 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.60
Sarah Jane Biagini 2 reported responses 3.37Eval / 5
Overall3.37 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.00
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.00
Reflection3.00
Respect4.00
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.00
Interaction3.50
Challenge3.50
Questions4.00
Maria Luiza Parvu 15 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.60
Reflection4.00
Respect4.60
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Betsey Biggs 29 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.68
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.23
Grading4.69
Reflection4.71
Respect4.81
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.79
Questions4.81
Thorsten Trimpop 36 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.34
Connection4.56
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.55
Reflection4.76
Respect4.83
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.84
Questions4.83
Tara L Knight 71 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
71 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.56
Connection4.80
Contribution4.98
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.81
Grading4.61
Reflection4.77
Respect4.97
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.97
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.80
Questions4.91
Toma Serban Peiu 8 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Keely Kernan 31 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.36
Connection4.61
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.91
Creativity4.89
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.80
Questions4.87
Sean A Winters 2 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Patrick Ryan Clark 18 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.81
Connection4.74
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.88
Reflection4.81
Respect4.92
Creativity4.93
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.95
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.