Course record CMDP
CMDP 3700
Digital Photographic Practices
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable10 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score60/100
Strong
Keely Kernan 161 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
161 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration3.74
Connection4.41
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.71
Reflection4.43
Respect4.82
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.62
Questions4.16
Samuel Joseph Carrothers 7 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.70
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Sarah Jane Biagini 6 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.11
Connection4.34
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.88
Grading3.77
Reflection4.65
Respect4.84
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.84
Interaction4.27
Challenge4.72
Questions4.84
Rachel Woolf 6 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Toma Serban Peiu 14 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Britland Irene Marie Tracy 32 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.26
Connection4.57
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.53
Grading4.67
Reflection4.61
Respect4.86
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.76
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.70
Questions4.68
Kevin J. Hoth 80 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
80 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.56
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.53
Grading4.50
Reflection4.68
Respect4.81
Creativity4.91
Feedback4.71
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.77
Questions4.66
Laurids Andersen Sonne 3 reported responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Ana Gonz<E1>Lez 8 reported responses 4.99Eval / 5
Overall4.99 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Naharin Shech 6 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.30
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.