Course record CMDP

CMDP 3400

Media Aesthetics

University of Colorado Boulder

616 grades12 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score21/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 12

Reece Luke Auguiste Ph.D. 173 grades · 1 term 3.41GPA
65.3% A
26.6% B
1.7% C
1.2% D
5.2% F

173 letter grades

Compare with the course
Ph.D. vs. the course average
A +11.4
B −3.0
C −7.8
D −0.5
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

8.0% withdrew · 15 of 188 enrolled.

Roberto Samuel Maria Azaretto 59 grades · 1 term 3.38GPA
66.1% A
16.9% B
13.6% C
0.0% D
3.4% F

59 letter grades

Compare with the course
Azaretto vs. the course average
A +12.2
B −12.6
C +4.0
D −1.6
F −2.0

Difference in percentage points.

4.8% withdrew · 3 of 62 enrolled.

Toma Serban Peiu 77 grades · 1 term 3.26GPA
63.6% A
20.8% B
7.8% C
0.0% D
7.8% F

77 letter grades

Compare with the course
Peiu vs. the course average
A +9.7
B −8.8
C −1.8
D −1.6
F +2.4

Difference in percentage points.

2.5% withdrew · 2 of 79 enrolled.

Christian Stanford Hammons 31 grades · 1 term 3.23GPA
48.4% A
38.7% B
9.7% C
0.0% D
3.2% F

31 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hammons vs. the course average
A −5.5
B +9.2
C +0.1
D −1.6
F −2.1

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 31 enrolled.

James Francis Supanick 276 grades · 1 term 3.03GPA
42.0% A
35.5% B
14.1% C
2.9% D
5.4% F

276 letter grades

Compare with the course
Supanick vs. the course average
A −11.9
B +6.0
C +4.6
D +1.3
F +0.1

Difference in percentage points.

2.5% withdrew · 7 of 283 enrolled.

Reece Luke Auguiste 56 reported responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5

56 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology3.64
Synthesis4.12
Collaboration3.85
Connection4.33
Contribution4.41
Discussion4.39
Inclusivity4.29
Grading2.97
Reflection4.16
Respect4.27
Creativity3.93
Feedback3.05
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.24
Questions3.59
Paulus Emil Horvath Van Horne 2 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration2.00
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction3.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Keely Kernan 5 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Naharin Shech 16 reported responses 3.73Eval / 5
Overall3.73 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.40
Connection3.40
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.20
Reflection3.50
Respect4.30
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.40
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.90
Questions3.40
Emma C Piper-Burket 15 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.70
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Show all 12 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.