Course record CMDP
CMDP 3400
Media Aesthetics
University of Colorado Boulder
616 grades12 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score21/100
Below average
Reece Luke Auguiste Ph.D. 173 grades · 1 term 3.41GPA
173 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ph.D. vs. the course average
A
+11.4
B
−3.0
C
−7.8
D
−0.5
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
8.0% withdrew · 15 of 188 enrolled.
Roberto Samuel Maria Azaretto 59 grades · 1 term 3.38GPA
59 letter grades
Compare with the course
Azaretto vs. the course average
A
+12.2
B
−12.6
C
+4.0
D
−1.6
F
−2.0
Difference in percentage points.
4.8% withdrew · 3 of 62 enrolled.
Overall4.15 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.15
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.85
Reflection4.35
Respect4.50
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.25
Questions4.55
Toma Serban Peiu 77 grades · 1 term 3.26GPA
77 letter grades
Compare with the course
Peiu vs. the course average
A
+9.7
B
−8.8
C
−1.8
D
−1.6
F
+2.4
Difference in percentage points.
2.5% withdrew · 2 of 79 enrolled.
Overall3.91 / 5
114 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology3.97
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration3.55
Connection4.11
Contribution4.18
Discussion3.95
Inclusivity4.47
Grading3.58
Reflection4.11
Respect4.26
Creativity4.29
Feedback3.19
Interaction4.28
Challenge4.12
Questions3.43
Christian Stanford Hammons 31 grades · 1 term 3.23GPA
31 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hammons vs. the course average
A
−5.5
B
+9.2
C
+0.1
D
−1.6
F
−2.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 31 enrolled.
Overall4.25 / 5
76 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.92
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration3.33
Connection4.18
Contribution4.16
Discussion3.93
Inclusivity4.03
Grading4.40
Reflection4.41
Respect4.59
Creativity4.75
Feedback3.87
Interaction3.96
Challenge4.24
Questions4.27
James Francis Supanick 276 grades · 1 term 3.03GPA
276 letter grades
Compare with the course
Supanick vs. the course average
A
−11.9
B
+6.0
C
+4.6
D
+1.3
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
2.5% withdrew · 7 of 283 enrolled.
Overall3.88 / 5
119 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology3.56
Synthesis3.71
Collaboration3.13
Connection3.60
Contribution3.87
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity4.28
Grading3.89
Reflection3.97
Respect4.47
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.57
Interaction4.23
Challenge3.91
Questions4.44
Reece Luke Auguiste 56 reported responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5
56 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology3.64
Synthesis4.12
Collaboration3.85
Connection4.33
Contribution4.41
Discussion4.39
Inclusivity4.29
Grading2.97
Reflection4.16
Respect4.27
Creativity3.93
Feedback3.05
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.24
Questions3.59
Paulus Emil Horvath Van Horne 2 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration2.00
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction3.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Keely Kernan 5 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Naharin Shech 16 reported responses 3.73Eval / 5
Overall3.73 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.40
Connection3.40
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.20
Reflection3.50
Respect4.30
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.40
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.90
Questions3.40
Emma C Piper-Burket 15 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.70
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Benjamin Nicholson 8 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Viola Arduini 1 reported responses 3.55Eval / 5
Overall3.55 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection5.00
Contribution2.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection3.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback1.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge2.00
Questions4.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.