Course record CMCI

CMCI 1010

Concepts and Creativity 1: Media, Communication, Information

University of Colorado Boulder

261 grades13 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020

Latest dated data is over 4 years old.

Flunk Score30/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 13

Lecia Jane Barker 261 grades · 1 term 3.33GPA
54.4% A
33.0% B
9.2% C
1.1% D
2.3% F

261 letter grades

3.3% withdrew · 9 of 270 enrolled.

Lecia Jane Archer 122 reported responses 3.65Eval / 5
Overall3.65 / 5

122 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.63
Connection4.10
Contribution3.53
Discussion3.65
Inclusivity3.93
Grading3.43
Reflection3.80
Respect3.97
Creativity3.83
Feedback3.25
Interaction4.10
Challenge3.45
Questions3.60
Matthew A. Koschmann 122 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

122 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.72
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.63
Connection4.10
Contribution3.53
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity3.93
Grading4.48
Reflection3.80
Respect4.75
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.18
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.55
Questions4.58
Bentley Brown 8 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.40
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.35
Reflection4.25
Respect4.50
Creativity3.10
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Matthew Dale Pickard 12 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.75
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.25
Questions4.50
Audrey Michaela Mayes 7 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.25
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.50
Reflection4.35
Respect4.75
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.25
Questions4.50
Danielle Soibelman 6 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.85
Contribution4.65
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.85
Grading5.00
Reflection4.85
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.85
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Mushfique Wadud 9 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology3.60
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.95
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity4.55
Grading3.55
Reflection3.80
Respect4.70
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.15
Questions4.00
Hande Batan 7 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology4.05
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.35
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.05
Reflection3.90
Respect4.75
Creativity3.75
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.90
Questions4.15
Marissa Ashley Lammon 8 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology4.25
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.90
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity2.75
Grading4.90
Reflection3.65
Respect4.90
Creativity3.85
Feedback3.25
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.85
Questions4.25
Show all 13 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.