Course record CMCI
CMCI 1010
Concepts and Creativity 1: Media, Communication, Information
University of Colorado Boulder
261 grades13 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020
Latest dated data is over 4 years old.
Flunk Score30/100
Below averageLecia Jane Barker 261 grades · 1 term 3.33GPA
261 letter grades
3.3% withdrew · 9 of 270 enrolled.
Lecia Jane Archer 122 reported responses 3.65Eval / 5
Overall3.65 / 5
122 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.63
Connection4.10
Contribution3.53
Discussion3.65
Inclusivity3.93
Grading3.43
Reflection3.80
Respect3.97
Creativity3.83
Feedback3.25
Interaction4.10
Challenge3.45
Questions3.60
Matthew A. Koschmann 122 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
122 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.72
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.63
Connection4.10
Contribution3.53
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity3.93
Grading4.48
Reflection3.80
Respect4.75
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.18
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.55
Questions4.58
Bentley Brown 8 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.40
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.35
Reflection4.25
Respect4.50
Creativity3.10
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Matthew Dale Pickard 12 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.75
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.25
Questions4.50
Audrey Michaela Mayes 7 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.25
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.50
Reflection4.35
Respect4.75
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.25
Questions4.50
Danielle Soibelman 6 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.85
Contribution4.65
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.85
Grading5.00
Reflection4.85
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.85
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Mushfique Wadud 9 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology3.60
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.95
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity4.55
Grading3.55
Reflection3.80
Respect4.70
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.15
Questions4.00
Hande Batan 7 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology4.05
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.35
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.05
Reflection3.90
Respect4.75
Creativity3.75
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.90
Questions4.15
Marissa Ashley Lammon 8 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology4.25
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.90
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity2.75
Grading4.90
Reflection3.65
Respect4.90
Creativity3.85
Feedback3.25
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.85
Questions4.25
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.