Course record CLAS
CLAS 3009
Modern Issues, Ancient Times
University of Colorado Boulder
445 grades7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score43/100
Mixed record
Anne Duray 147 grades · 1 term 3.40GPA
147 letter grades
Compare with the course
Duray vs. the course average
A
+5.3
B
−1.1
C
−3.1
D
−1.6
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
3.3% withdrew · 5 of 152 enrolled.
Overall4.02 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.09
Technology4.32
Synthesis3.81
Collaboration4.05
Connection3.84
Contribution4.08
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.12
Reflection3.88
Respect4.41
Creativity3.97
Feedback3.61
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.04
Questions4.25
Travis Rick Rupp 134 grades · 1 term 3.38GPA
134 letter grades
Compare with the course
Rupp vs. the course average
A
+1.1
B
−0.8
C
+1.6
D
+0.1
F
−2.1
Difference in percentage points.
1.5% withdrew · 2 of 136 enrolled.
Overall4.69 / 5
103 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration3.99
Connection4.68
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.73
Reflection4.65
Respect4.89
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.59
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.70
Questions4.77
Catherine Steidl 75 grades · 1 term 3.27GPA
75 letter grades
Compare with the course
Steidl vs. the course average
A
−3.3
B
+1.7
C
+2.2
D
+0.4
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
6.3% withdrew · 5 of 80 enrolled.
Overall4.81 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.87
Reflection4.87
Respect4.93
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.93
Dimitri Nakassis 89 grades · 1 term 3.11GPA
89 letter grades
Compare with the course
Nakassis vs. the course average
A
−7.6
B
+1.6
C
+0.9
D
+2.0
F
+3.1
Difference in percentage points.
5.3% withdrew · 5 of 94 enrolled.
Overall4.58 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.89
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.24
Collaboration3.26
Connection4.39
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.41
Reflection4.53
Respect5.00
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.26
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Frances Harrington 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Reflection5.00
Interaction5.00
Kirk T Ambrose 5 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.40
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Katelyn Reeves 15 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.50
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.