Course record CLAS
CLAS 2110
Gender and Sexuality in Ancient Rome
University of Colorado Boulder
468 grades6 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score44/100
Mixed recordSamuel Louis Kindick 67 grades · 1 term 3.69GPA
67 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kindick vs. the course average
A
+30.2
B
−29.1
C
−3.2
D
−0.2
F
+2.3
Difference in percentage points.
4.3% withdrew · 3 of 70 enrolled.
Overall4.45 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.78
Connection3.98
Contribution4.41
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.56
Reflection4.40
Respect4.62
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.50
Questions4.68
Zachary Herz 182 grades · 1 term 3.45GPA
182 letter grades
Compare with the course
Herz vs. the course average
A
−6.8
B
+13.2
C
−3.6
D
−1.7
F
−1.0
Difference in percentage points.
4.2% withdrew · 8 of 190 enrolled.
Overall4.28 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.10
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Isabel Koster 185 grades · 1 term 3.26GPA
185 letter grades
Compare with the course
Koster vs. the course average
A
−3.9
B
−0.6
C
+2.3
D
+2.1
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
1.6% withdrew · 3 of 188 enrolled.
Overall4.48 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration3.39
Connection4.74
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.75
Reflection4.73
Respect4.95
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.88
Questions4.50
Tyler Andrew Denton 34 grades · 1 term 3.25GPA
34 letter grades
Compare with the course
Denton vs. the course average
A
−2.0
B
−10.0
C
+12.9
D
−1.7
F
+0.8
Difference in percentage points.
2.9% withdrew · 1 of 35 enrolled.
Overall4.40 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration2.80
Connection4.20
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.90
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction3.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Mitchell Reece Pentzer 46 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.34
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration3.64
Connection4.54
Contribution4.42
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.86
Grading4.27
Reflection4.70
Respect4.79
Creativity4.51
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.70
Questions4.69
Reina E Callier 11 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.00
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.40
Reflection4.10
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.40
Questions4.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.