Course record CLAS
CLAS 1030
Introduction to Western Philosophy: Ancient
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable9 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score39/100
Below average
Thomas Anthony Bonn 13 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.17
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.65
Reflection4.80
Respect4.76
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.65
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Martin Robert Eyestone 9 reported responses 2.79Eval / 5
Overall2.79 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology2.80
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration1.65
Connection2.50
Contribution2.85
Discussion3.25
Inclusivity2.55
Grading3.00
Reflection3.25
Respect3.40
Creativity2.90
Feedback2.10
Interaction2.80
Challenge2.80
Questions3.40
Dawn Marie Jacob 8 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.35
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.60
Reflection4.75
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.75
Challenge5.00
Questions4.75
Stanley Matthew Stolte 4 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence1.61
Technology4.75
Synthesis1.53
Collaboration4.11
Connection4.08
Contribution1.61
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity1.46
Grading4.75
Reflection3.31
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.15
Challenge5.00
Questions4.75
Wen Xu 8 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology3.65
Synthesis3.92
Collaboration3.73
Connection3.85
Contribution3.38
Discussion4.31
Inclusivity3.77
Grading4.31
Reflection3.96
Respect4.62
Creativity3.92
Feedback3.73
Interaction4.04
Challenge4.42
Questions4.42
Alan G Sumler 2 reported responses 2.37Eval / 5
Overall2.37 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.00
Technology2.00
Synthesis2.00
Collaboration1.00
Connection3.50
Contribution1.00
Discussion2.00
Inclusivity3.50
Grading2.00
Reflection3.00
Respect4.50
Creativity3.00
Feedback2.00
Interaction2.50
Challenge2.00
Questions2.00
Matthew Wennemann 2 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology1.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Spencer Cardwell 4 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology4.23
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.77
Connection3.81
Contribution4.19
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity4.88
Grading3.75
Reflection4.81
Respect4.38
Creativity4.09
Feedback4.38
Interaction3.81
Challenge4.19
Questions4.38
Mi-Kyoung Lee 3 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology3.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration3.30
Connection3.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.30
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.