Course record CHIN

CHIN 3120

Advanced Chinese 2

University of Colorado Boulder

138 grades13 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score67/100
Strong

Professors 10 of 13

Yingjie Li 69 grades · 1 term 3.64GPA
81.2% A
13.0% B
4.3% C
0.0% D
1.4% F

69 letter grades

Compare with the course
Li vs. the course average
A +8.7
B −4.3
C −4.3
D same
F same

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 69 enrolled.

Chun-Ling Hsu 30 grades · 1 term 3.41GPA
60.0% A
26.7% B
13.3% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

30 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hsu vs. the course average
A −12.5
B +9.3
C +4.6
D same
F −1.4

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 30 enrolled.

Runqing Qi 39 grades · 1 term 3.40GPA
66.7% A
17.9% B
12.8% C
0.0% D
2.6% F

39 letter grades

Compare with the course
Qi vs. the course average
A −5.8
B +0.6
C +4.1
D same
F +1.1

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 39 enrolled.

Xueyue Liu 5 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.00
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.80
Reflection3.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.00
Questions4.40
Sijia Li 10 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Xiaoyue Luo 24 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.60
Reflection4.75
Respect4.95
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Xiangyu Wang 24 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.55
Reflection4.75
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Yaqi Gao 27 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.35
Reflection4.55
Respect4.80
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.40
Questions4.70
Zoushiyu Zhou 27 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.50
Reflection4.55
Respect4.85
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.65
Questions4.80
Yue Liu 38 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5

38 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.94
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.92
Reflection4.83
Respect4.95
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.92
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.92
Questions4.85
Show all 13 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.