Course record CHIN

CHIN 3110

Advanced Chinese 1

University of Colorado Boulder

104 grades13 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score55/100
Mixed record

Professors 10 of 13

Runqing Qi 31 grades · 1 term 3.59GPA
74.2% A
19.4% B
6.5% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

31 letter grades

Compare with the course
Qi vs. the course average
A +4.0
B −1.8
C −1.2
D same
F −1.0

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 31 enrolled.

Yingjie Li 73 grades · 1 term 3.52GPA
68.5% A
21.9% B
8.2% C
0.0% D
1.4% F

73 letter grades

Compare with the course
Li vs. the course average
A −1.7
B +0.8
C +0.5
D same
F +0.4

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 73 enrolled.

Letian Wang 6 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.30
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Sijia Li 13 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.20
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Xiangyu Wang 5 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.80
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.20
Questions5.00
Guanrui Gong 15 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.40
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Federico Beltrame 24 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.60
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.05
Reflection4.40
Respect4.55
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.30
Questions4.60
Yanan Xiang 33 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

33 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.50
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.95
Grading3.95
Reflection4.25
Respect4.75
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.65
Questions4.60
Zoushiyu Zhou 33 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

33 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.50
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.10
Reflection4.25
Respect4.65
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.55
Questions4.55
Jing Tuskind 12 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.65
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.65
Reflection4.10
Respect4.65
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.00
Questions4.60
Show all 13 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.