Course record CHIN

CHIN 2120

Intermediate Chinese 2

University of Colorado Boulder

164 grades17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score63/100
Strong

Professors 10 of 17

Yingjie Li 30 grades · 1 term 3.69GPA
76.7% A
23.3% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

30 letter grades

Compare with the course
Li vs. the course average
A +12.6
B −5.3
C −5.5
D −1.2
F −0.6

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 30 enrolled.

Chun-Ling Hsu 29 grades · 1 term 3.62GPA
75.9% A
17.2% B
3.4% C
3.4% D
0.0% F

29 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hsu vs. the course average
A +11.8
B −11.4
C −2.0
D +2.2
F −0.6

Difference in percentage points.

9.4% withdrew · 3 of 32 enrolled.

Jin Chen 39 grades · 1 term 3.55GPA
64.1% A
28.2% B
7.7% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

39 letter grades

Compare with the course
Chen vs. the course average
A +0.1
B −0.5
C +2.2
D −1.2
F −0.6

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 39 enrolled.

Yu Zhang 33 grades · 1 term 3.46GPA
63.6% A
33.3% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
3.0% F

33 letter grades

Compare with the course
Zhang vs. the course average
A −0.4
B +4.7
C −5.5
D −1.2
F +2.4

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 33 enrolled.

Runqing Qi 33 grades · 1 term 3.18GPA
42.4% A
39.4% B
15.2% C
3.0% D
0.0% F

33 letter grades

Compare with the course
Qi vs. the course average
A −21.6
B +10.7
C +9.7
D +1.8
F −0.6

Difference in percentage points.

2.9% withdrew · 1 of 34 enrolled.

Wai Yee Chan 10 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.30
Reflection4.30
Respect4.30
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.30
Questions4.60
Letian Wang 16 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.50
Contribution4.10
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.40
Reflection4.20
Respect4.60
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.30
Questions4.60
Federico Beltrame 61 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

61 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.81
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.76
Grading4.69
Reflection4.88
Respect4.60
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.42
Questions4.71
Benjamin Joseph Bond 41 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

41 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.59
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.73
Reflection4.68
Respect4.80
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.86
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.79
Questions4.79
Jinghui Wang 13 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.90
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.30
Reflection4.80
Respect4.85
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.30
Questions4.65
Show all 17 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.