Course record CHIN

CHIN 2110

Intermediate Chinese 1

University of Colorado Boulder

135 grades22 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score50/100
Mixed record

Professors 10 of 22

Chun-Ling Hsu 29 grades · 1 term 3.50GPA
69.0% A
17.2% B
13.8% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

29 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hsu vs. the course average
A +12.7
B −12.4
C +3.4
D −3.0
F −0.7

Difference in percentage points.

6.5% withdrew · 2 of 31 enrolled.

Yingjie Li 30 grades · 1 term 3.39GPA
66.7% A
20.0% B
10.0% C
0.0% D
3.3% F

30 letter grades

Compare with the course
Li vs. the course average
A +10.4
B −9.6
C −0.4
D −3.0
F +2.6

Difference in percentage points.

3.2% withdrew · 1 of 31 enrolled.

Runqing Qi 41 grades · 1 term 3.30GPA
51.2% A
39.0% B
4.9% C
4.9% D
0.0% F

41 letter grades

Compare with the course
Qi vs. the course average
A −5.1
B +9.4
C −5.5
D +1.9
F −0.7

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 41 enrolled.

Yu Zhang 35 grades · 1 term 3.12GPA
42.9% A
37.1% B
14.3% C
5.7% D
0.0% F

35 letter grades

Compare with the course
Zhang vs. the course average
A −13.4
B +7.5
C +3.9
D +2.8
F −0.7

Difference in percentage points.

2.8% withdrew · 1 of 36 enrolled.

Xiaoyue Luo 12 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.90
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Xueyue Liu 2 reported responses 3.25Eval / 5
Overall3.25 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis2.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.00
Contribution3.50
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.00
Reflection3.50
Respect4.50
Creativity1.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction3.50
Challenge2.50
Questions3.50
Camille Kathleen Byrne 3 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Chi Feng 6 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.70
Reflection4.50
Respect4.30
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.20
Questions4.30
Huizhi Wang 12 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Jinghui Wang 20 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.70
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.80
Reflection4.87
Respect5.00
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Show all 22 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.