Course record CHIN
CHIN 2110
Intermediate Chinese 1
University of Colorado Boulder
135 grades22 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score50/100
Mixed record
Chun-Ling Hsu 29 grades · 1 term 3.50GPA
29 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hsu vs. the course average
A
+12.7
B
−12.4
C
+3.4
D
−3.0
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
6.5% withdrew · 2 of 31 enrolled.
Overall3.82 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.97
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.10
Collaboration3.47
Connection3.47
Contribution3.97
Discussion3.83
Inclusivity3.20
Grading3.97
Reflection4.13
Respect4.30
Creativity3.53
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.67
Questions4.50
Yingjie Li 30 grades · 1 term 3.39GPA
30 letter grades
Compare with the course
Li vs. the course average
A
+10.4
B
−9.6
C
−0.4
D
−3.0
F
+2.6
Difference in percentage points.
3.2% withdrew · 1 of 31 enrolled.
Overall4.78 / 5
57 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.94
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.64
Grading4.82
Reflection4.97
Respect4.98
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.98
Questions4.83
Runqing Qi 41 grades · 1 term 3.30GPA
41 letter grades
Compare with the course
Qi vs. the course average
A
−5.1
B
+9.4
C
−5.5
D
+1.9
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 41 enrolled.
Overall4.76 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.33
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.93
Grading4.83
Reflection4.57
Respect4.90
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.87
Questions4.80
Yu Zhang 35 grades · 1 term 3.12GPA
35 letter grades
Compare with the course
Zhang vs. the course average
A
−13.4
B
+7.5
C
+3.9
D
+2.8
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
2.8% withdrew · 1 of 36 enrolled.
Overall4.81 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.97
Technology4.97
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.77
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.87
Reflection4.87
Respect4.97
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.97
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Xiaoyue Luo 12 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.90
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Xueyue Liu 2 reported responses 3.25Eval / 5
Overall3.25 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis2.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.00
Contribution3.50
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.00
Reflection3.50
Respect4.50
Creativity1.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction3.50
Challenge2.50
Questions3.50
Camille Kathleen Byrne 3 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Chi Feng 6 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.70
Reflection4.50
Respect4.30
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.20
Questions4.30
Huizhi Wang 12 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Jinghui Wang 20 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.70
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.80
Reflection4.87
Respect5.00
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Xiangyu Wang 19 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.77
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.70
Reflection4.87
Respect4.90
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.97
Zoushiyu Zhou 18 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.97
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.77
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.53
Reflection4.87
Respect4.97
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.53
Questions4.97
Sean Ang 32 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.33
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity3.93
Grading4.47
Reflection4.57
Respect4.73
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.77
Questions4.87
Federico Beltrame 55 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
55 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.67
Contribution4.68
Discussion3.82
Inclusivity4.42
Grading4.06
Reflection4.80
Respect4.40
Creativity4.16
Feedback4.02
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.16
Questions4.40
Benjamin Joseph Bond 32 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.33
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity3.93
Grading4.70
Reflection4.57
Respect4.93
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.77
Questions4.80
Yaqi Gao 32 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.33
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity3.93
Grading4.50
Reflection4.57
Respect4.63
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.83
Questions4.77
Yue Liu 23 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.77
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.47
Reflection4.87
Respect4.87
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.60
Questions4.77
Luna Shang 23 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.77
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.77
Reflection4.87
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.73
Questions4.90
Ke Wu 23 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.77
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.77
Reflection4.87
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.70
Questions4.87
Qing Luo 13 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.73
Reflection5.00
Respect4.83
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.43
Questions4.83
Jiayi Peng 13 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.93
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.93
Questions4.90
Yijing Yin 13 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.67
Reflection5.00
Respect4.90
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.57
Questions4.83
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.