Course record CHIN

CHIN 1010

Beginning Chinese 1

University of Colorado Boulder

233 grades23 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score46/100
Mixed record

Professors 10 of 23

Jin Chen 48 grades · 1 term 3.55GPA
79.2% A
12.5% B
0.0% C
4.2% D
4.2% F

48 letter grades

Compare with the course
Chen vs. the course average
A +16.9
B −6.4
C −9.9
D +1.6
F −2.3

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 48 enrolled.

Chun-Ling Hsu 69 grades · 1 term 3.22GPA
53.6% A
27.5% B
11.6% C
4.3% D
2.9% F

69 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hsu vs. the course average
A −8.6
B +8.7
C +1.7
D +1.8
F −3.5

Difference in percentage points.

4.2% withdrew · 3 of 72 enrolled.

Yu Zhang 44 grades · 1 term 3.14GPA
52.3% A
29.5% B
9.1% C
0.0% D
9.1% F

44 letter grades

Compare with the course
Zhang vs. the course average
A −10.0
B +10.7
C −0.8
D −2.6
F +2.7

Difference in percentage points.

2.2% withdrew · 1 of 45 enrolled.

Yingjie Li 72 grades · 1 term 3.13GPA
65.3% A
8.3% B
15.3% C
1.4% D
9.7% F

72 letter grades

Compare with the course
Li vs. the course average
A +3.0
B −10.6
C +5.4
D −1.2
F +3.3

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 72 enrolled.

Jinghui Wang 13 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.09
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.14
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.18
Contribution4.26
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity4.09
Grading4.15
Reflection4.85
Respect4.69
Creativity4.03
Feedback4.46
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.31
Questions4.62
Xiangyu Wang 2 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity3.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Huizhi Wang 8 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Huiyao Yang 19 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.58
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.28
Grading4.92
Reflection4.77
Respect4.90
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.92
Questions4.92
Zike Ren 14 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.80
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.70
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Benjamin Joseph Bond 12 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Show all 23 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.