Course record CHIN
CHIN 1010
Beginning Chinese 1
University of Colorado Boulder
233 grades23 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score46/100
Mixed record
Jin Chen 48 grades · 1 term 3.55GPA
48 letter grades
Compare with the course
Chen vs. the course average
A
+16.9
B
−6.4
C
−9.9
D
+1.6
F
−2.3
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 48 enrolled.
Overall4.79 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.62
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.72
Reflection4.85
Respect4.73
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.88
Questions4.88
Chun-Ling Hsu 69 grades · 1 term 3.22GPA
69 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hsu vs. the course average
A
−8.6
B
+8.7
C
+1.7
D
+1.8
F
−3.5
Difference in percentage points.
4.2% withdrew · 3 of 72 enrolled.
Overall4.46 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.10
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity3.93
Grading4.40
Reflection4.58
Respect4.68
Creativity4.08
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.55
Questions4.65
Yu Zhang 44 grades · 1 term 3.14GPA
44 letter grades
Compare with the course
Zhang vs. the course average
A
−10.0
B
+10.7
C
−0.8
D
−2.6
F
+2.7
Difference in percentage points.
2.2% withdrew · 1 of 45 enrolled.
Overall4.80 / 5
55 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.44
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.79
Reflection4.69
Respect4.95
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.90
Questions4.81
Yingjie Li 72 grades · 1 term 3.13GPA
72 letter grades
Compare with the course
Li vs. the course average
A
+3.0
B
−10.6
C
+5.4
D
−1.2
F
+3.3
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 72 enrolled.
Overall4.48 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.48
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.43
Grading4.85
Reflection4.80
Respect4.87
Creativity4.18
Feedback4.82
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.66
Questions4.91
Jinghui Wang 13 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.09
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.14
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.18
Contribution4.26
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity4.09
Grading4.15
Reflection4.85
Respect4.69
Creativity4.03
Feedback4.46
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.31
Questions4.62
Xiangyu Wang 2 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity3.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Huizhi Wang 8 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Huiyao Yang 19 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.58
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.28
Grading4.92
Reflection4.77
Respect4.90
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.92
Questions4.92
Zike Ren 14 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.80
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.70
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Benjamin Joseph Bond 12 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Runqing Qi 41 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.18
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.63
Reflection4.58
Respect4.95
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.75
Questions4.93
Yaqi Gao 45 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.41
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.26
Grading4.62
Reflection4.57
Respect4.79
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.60
Questions4.59
Luna Shang 26 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.31
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.29
Grading4.87
Reflection4.72
Respect4.84
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.69
Questions4.95
Camille Kathleen Byrne 32 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.22
Contribution4.42
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.59
Reflection4.62
Respect4.73
Creativity4.22
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.46
Questions4.92
Yanan Xiang 12 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology4.55
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.15
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.65
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.70
Questions4.60
Ke Wu 42 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.01
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.19
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.12
Grading4.64
Reflection4.59
Respect4.85
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.77
Questions4.78
Yue Liu 18 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.25
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect4.60
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.40
Questions4.75
Jiayi Peng 28 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.43
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.50
Reflection4.63
Respect4.83
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.63
Questions4.73
Yetong Yang 28 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.43
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.33
Reflection4.63
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.63
Questions4.80
Zoushiyu Zhou 28 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.43
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.47
Reflection4.63
Respect4.87
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.43
Questions4.60
Xianming Qin 32 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.18
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.73
Reflection4.58
Respect4.85
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.82
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.77
Questions4.68
Jingyun Song 32 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.18
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.90
Reflection4.58
Respect4.88
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.83
Questions4.93
Huiyu Tan 32 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.18
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.70
Reflection4.58
Respect4.83
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.