Fall 2025 · Section not specified
Instructor:
Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Course record CHEN
CHEN 5838
Special Topics in Chemical Engineering
University of Colorado Boulder
287 grades25 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score74/100
Strong
Timothy John White 37 grades · 1 term 3.97GPA
37 letter grades
Compare with the course
White vs. the course average
A
+8.4
B
−7.8
C
−0.3
D
same
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 37 enrolled.
Overall4.51 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.96
Connection4.69
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity3.76
Grading4.01
Reflection4.06
Respect4.36
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.34
Challenge4.67
Questions4.05
Michael R Shirts 111 grades · 1 term 3.93GPA
111 letter grades
Compare with the course
Shirts vs. the course average
A
+6.6
B
−5.9
C
−0.3
D
same
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
0.9% withdrew · 1 of 112 enrolled.
Overall4.65 / 5
103 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.05
Contribution4.31
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity2.96
Grading4.59
Reflection4.46
Respect4.60
Creativity4.54
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.81
Questions4.61
Kristi S Anseth 32 grades · 1 term 3.46GPA
32 letter grades
Compare with the course
Anseth vs. the course average
A
−35.7
B
+33.3
C
+2.8
D
same
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 32 enrolled.
Overall4.33 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.75
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity3.88
Grading4.23
Reflection4.65
Respect4.88
Creativity4.48
Feedback3.19
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.53
Questions4.73
Ryan Hayward 19 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
19 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 19 enrolled.
Overall4.55 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.90
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.60
Reflection4.00
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.70
Questions4.60
Joel L. Kaar 10 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
10 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 10 enrolled.
Overall4.70 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.75
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.45
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.85
Questions5.00
Charles Bruce Musgrave 14 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.98GPA
14 letter grades · Limited sample
6.7% withdrew · 1 of 15 enrolled.
Overall4.26 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity2.70
Grading3.10
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.60
Christine M Hrenya 10 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.94GPA
10 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 10 enrolled.
Overall4.65 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.70
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.60
Adam P Holewinski 14 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.87GPA
14 letter grades · Limited sample
6.7% withdrew · 1 of 15 enrolled.
Overall4.53 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.04
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration3.74
Connection4.39
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.46
Grading4.23
Reflection4.61
Respect4.90
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.21
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.62
Questions4.81
Daniel K. Schwartz 16 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.75GPA
16 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 16 enrolled.
Overall4.74 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.98
Contribution4.97
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.98
Reflection4.98
Respect5.00
Creativity4.99
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.98
Challenge5.00
Questions4.99
Christopher Bowman 13 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.72GPA
13 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 13 enrolled.
Overall4.48 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.40
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Course documents
Syllabi 1
University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.