Course record CHEN

CHEN 4838

Special Topics in Chemical Engineering

University of Colorado Boulder

272 grades14 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score79/100
Strong

Professors 10 of 14

Joel L. Kaar 46 grades · 1 term 3.94GPA
97.8% A
2.2% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

46 letter grades

Compare with the course
Kaar vs. the course average
A +8.1
B −6.3
C −1.8
D same
F same

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 46 enrolled.

Laurel Hind 71 grades · 1 term 3.93GPA
95.8% A
1.4% B
2.8% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

71 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hind vs. the course average
A +6.1
B −7.0
C +1.0
D same
F same

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 71 enrolled.

Jason A Burdick 36 grades · 1 term 3.84GPA
86.1% A
13.9% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

36 letter grades

Compare with the course
Burdick vs. the course average
A −3.6
B +5.4
C −1.8
D same
F same

Difference in percentage points.

5.3% withdrew · 2 of 38 enrolled.

Michael David Mcgehee 60 grades · 1 term 3.77GPA
81.7% A
16.7% B
1.7% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

60 letter grades

Compare with the course
Mcgehee vs. the course average
A −8.0
B +8.2
C −0.2
D same
F same

Difference in percentage points.

1.6% withdrew · 1 of 61 enrolled.

Carolyn Schoenbaum Kohlmeier 33 grades · 1 term 3.72GPA
84.8% A
9.1% B
6.1% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

33 letter grades

Compare with the course
Kohlmeier vs. the course average
A −4.9
B +0.6
C +4.2
D same
F same

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 33 enrolled.

Anushree Chatterjee 14 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.93GPA
92.9% A
7.1% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

14 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 14 enrolled.

Adam P Holewinski 12 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.81GPA
83.3% A
16.7% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

12 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 12 enrolled.

Evan Alexander Bisirri 14 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.00
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Ryan Jackson Morelock 2 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection5.00
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Samantha Kaczaral 2 reported responses 3.80Eval / 5
Overall3.80 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis2.50
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity2.00
Grading4.50
Reflection3.50
Respect4.00
Creativity3.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction3.00
Challenge3.50
Questions4.50
Show all 14 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 1

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Spring 2025 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.