Course record CHEN

CHEN 4330

Kinetics and Reactor Design

University of Colorado Boulder

218 grades9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score24/100
Below average

Professors 9 of 9

Robert H Davis 39 grades · 1 term 2.93GPA
28.2% A
43.6% B
23.1% C
5.1% D
0.0% F

39 letter grades

Compare with the course
Davis vs. the course average
A +3.4
B +7.4
C −8.1
D −1.3
F −1.4

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 39 enrolled.

Christopher Bowman 134 grades · 1 term 2.77GPA
23.1% A
37.3% B
32.8% C
6.0% D
0.7% F

134 letter grades

Compare with the course
Bowman vs. the course average
A −1.6
B +1.1
C +1.6
D −0.5
F −0.6

Difference in percentage points.

0.7% withdrew · 1 of 135 enrolled.

Joel L. Kaar 45 grades · 1 term 2.63GPA
26.7% A
26.7% B
33.3% C
8.9% D
4.4% F

45 letter grades

Compare with the course
Kaar vs. the course average
A +1.9
B −9.6
C +2.1
D +2.5
F +3.1

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 45 enrolled.

Tayler Suzanne Hebner 35 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

35 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.40
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.50
Alexander Osterbaan 36 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

36 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.20
Reflection4.80
Respect4.50
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Zack Mora 35 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

35 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Ben Nelson 35 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

35 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.40
Reflection4.70
Respect4.40
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Charles Raymond Nuttelman 25 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.10
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.30
Reflection4.30
Respect4.30
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.20
Questions4.40
Eva Peurrung 25 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.10
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.60
Reflection4.30
Respect4.60
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Course documents

Syllabi 1

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.