Course record CHEN

CHEN 3320

Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics 1

University of Colorado Boulder

381 grades9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score27/100
Below average

Professors 9 of 9

Reed Konane Bay 151 grades · 1 term 2.98GPA
31.1% A
43.7% B
19.9% C
4.0% D
1.3% F

151 letter grades

Compare with the course
Bay vs. the course average
A +1.7
B +5.1
C −7.4
D +0.8
F −0.3

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 151 enrolled.

Wilson Smith 118 grades · 1 term 2.88GPA
28.8% A
37.3% B
30.5% C
2.5% D
0.8% F

118 letter grades

Compare with the course
Smith vs. the course average
A −0.6
B −1.3
C +3.2
D −0.6
F −0.7

Difference in percentage points.

4.8% withdrew · 6 of 124 enrolled.

Jerome Michael Fox 112 grades · 1 term 2.78GPA
27.7% A
33.0% B
33.9% C
2.7% D
2.7% F

112 letter grades

Compare with the course
Fox vs. the course average
A −1.7
B −5.5
C +6.6
D −0.5
F +1.1

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 112 enrolled.

Ella A Hushka 79 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

79 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.45
Connection3.95
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.25
Grading4.20
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions4.35
Grant Bauman 76 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

76 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.10
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.55
Grading4.40
Reflection4.75
Respect4.90
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.75
Questions4.80
James William Medlin 78 reported responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5

78 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection3.40
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity2.70
Grading3.20
Reflection4.00
Respect4.30
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.10
Questions3.90
David Kelaita 57 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

57 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Annette Thompson 57 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

57 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.20
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Kiera Croland 99 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

99 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.20
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Course documents

Syllabi 1

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Spring 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.