Spring 2026 · Section not specified
Instructor not extracted
Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Course record CHEN
CHEN 3220
Chemical Engineering Separations
University of Colorado Boulder
466 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score36/100
Below average
Laurel Hind 359 grades · 1 term 3.35GPA
359 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hind vs. the course average
A
+2.8
B
−1.6
C
−1.6
D
+0.2
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
1.1% withdrew · 4 of 363 enrolled.
Overall4.24 / 5
157 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.04
Synthesis4.06
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.27
Contribution3.91
Discussion4.24
Inclusivity3.93
Grading4.07
Reflection4.23
Respect4.53
Creativity4.02
Feedback3.67
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.06
Questions3.93
Ezra Andrew Baghdady 107 grades · 1 term 3.27GPA
107 letter grades
Compare with the course
Baghdady vs. the course average
A
−9.5
B
+5.5
C
+5.5
D
−0.6
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
1.8% withdrew · 2 of 109 enrolled.
Overall4.44 / 5
76 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.50
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Jacob Kyle Kenny 60 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
60 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.40
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.35
Reflection4.35
Respect4.80
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.35
Questions4.50
Wendy Mores Young 168 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
168 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.24
Collaboration4.64
Connection4.49
Contribution3.96
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.31
Reflection4.35
Respect4.54
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.53
Questions4.27
Daisy Isabelle Fuchs 67 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
67 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.50
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.30
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.30
Gregory Donovan 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Reflection5.00
Interaction5.00
Charles Raymond Nuttelman 135 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
135 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.35
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity4.23
Grading4.32
Reflection4.35
Respect4.60
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.65
Questions4.27
Sasha Neefe 70 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
70 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.40
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.30
Kathryn O'Harra 70 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
70 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.40
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Sam Andrzejewski 58 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
58 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.40
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Course documents
Syllabi 1
University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.